ArticleScientific reports2026
An interpretable machine learning model for biomarker identification and diagnostic nomogram development in hypo-productive thrombocytopenia.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Thrombocytopenia is a common hematological disorder with diverse etiologies. This study aimed to identify potential biomarkers and to develop an interpretable diagnostic nomogram for the early recognition of hypo-productive thrombocytopenia. This retrospective study included 185 patients with thrombocytopenia who were admitted to the Department of Hematology at the Affiliated Suzhou Hospital of Nanjing Medical University between 2020 and 2025. Patients were categorized into hypo-productive thrombocytopenia (n = 114) and hyper-destructive thrombocytopenia (n = 71) according to etiology. Feature selection was performed using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression, support vector machine recursive feature elimination (SVM-RFE), and Boruta algorithms, followed by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. Six machine learning (ML) models were developed and compared based on residual analysis and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The optimal model was interpreted using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis. The diagnostic nomogram was evaluated by the ROC, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Finally, age, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and mean platelet volume (MPV) were identified as key predictors. The generalized linear model(GLM)-based nomogram demonstrated strong discriminative ability (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.945, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.900-0.976) with excellent calibration. DCA demonstrated a higher net benefit for the nomogram than individual predictors. The interpretable machine learning derived nomogram may serve as a practical and non-invasive tool to assist in the early identification of hypo-productive thrombocytopenia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.