ArticleScientific reports2026
Dynamic monitoring of railway bridges via coupling digital twins with deep reinforcement learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Railway-bridge anomaly detection during retrofitting is a core structural health monitoring (SHM) task, requiring timely alarms for safety. It is challenging because responses are strongly nonstationary and distorted by environmental and operational variability, while sensing budgets constrain what can be observed. Classical feature-and-threshold pipelines are interpretable but fragile to operating-condition drift, yielding unstable alarms without compensation. Deep time-series detectors are effective, but data-only scores are hard to calibrate into risk cues and usually assume fixed sensing. Digital twin (DT) approaches provide uncertainty-aware belief tracking, yet twin-only alarming may respond slowly and may ignore sequential accuracy-cost optimization. We propose Residual Digital-Twin Monitoring with Branching Dueling Q-learning (RDTM-BDQ), coupling an event-triggered Bayesian DT, a mask-aware residual Mamba encoder, and a Branching Dueling Double Deep Q-Network (BDQ) policy. Hybrid evidence fuses DT innovation energy and a normalized safety-margin index with an inverse-projection inconsistency score from the Mamba embedding, forming a belief-augmented state representation for joint alarm and sensing decisions. Training is off-policy with prioritized replay, using a reward that penalizes delay, false alarms, misses, and sensing cost, plus a consistency loss for the inverse projection head. Experiments on the public KW51 and Z24 datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of RDTM-BDQ: on KW51 it achieves 0.95 F1-score (F1) and 0.98 precision, and on Z24 it reaches 0.92 F1-score, confirming robustness to both retrofit-induced and environmentally-induced nonstationarity. Operating-point analysis on KW51 further shows an explicit accuracy-burden-cost trade-off, e.g., reducing detection delay from 41.4 h to 3.9 h with controllable monitoring cost. Ablations confirm that DT cues, residual Mamba encoding, and branching Q-learning each improve accuracy and stability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.