ArticleScientific reports2026
Design, modification, and manufacture of animal-drawn secondary tillage implements for wheat-based light soil farming systems in Misrak Bedawacho District, Central Ethiopia.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study focused on the design modification, manufacture, and performance evaluation of animal-drawn secondary tillage tools for furrowing in a wheat-based light soil farming system in 2nd Chefa Kebele, Misrak Bedawacho District, Hadiya Zone, Central Ethiopia. The objective was to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the traditional maresha plough while maintaining compatibility with local farming practices. Field experiments were conducted under actual farming conditions using pairs of oxen, comparing traditional and modified implements based on weight, tillage depth, rake angle, pulling force, draft force, field capacity, efficiency, structural safety, and soil physical properties. The modified tools were lighter and incorporated a reduced rake angle and multi-plough configurations to enhance performance. Results showed significant improvements, with working time reduced from 6.89 h to 1.98 h for 0.25 ha and field capacity increasing from 0.036 to 0.126 ha/hr, while field efficiency reached up to 99.21%. Although draft force increased slightly with additional ploughshares, pulling force remained within manageable limits. Structural analysis confirmed that all components operated safely within allowable stress limits. The modified tools also improved soil plasticity and moisture retention, supporting better crop establishment. In conclusion, the modified animal-drawn tillage implements offer a practical, efficient, and sustainable solution for smallholder farmers by enhancing productivity and reducing labor and animal fatigue. It is recommended that these tools be promoted through local fabrication, extension services, and farmer training, while further studies should assess long-term performance, adaptability, and adoption across different agro-ecological conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.