ArticleScientific reports2026
A multi-model carbon estimation framework for new urban district planning-integrating land use, transportation, and investment-based emission models.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study proposes an integrated multi-model coupling framework for ex-ante carbon assessment in new urban district planning. The framework combines investment allocation, land-use carbon estimation, and traffic emission models within a unified analytical environment to simulate spatial and economic feedbacks that drive urban carbon emissions. Compared with conventional carbon assessment approaches, which often evaluate land use and transport as independent modules, the proposed framework introduces a rule-based coupling mechanism that dynamically links investment intensity, spatial configuration, and carbon output through iterative feedback. Each sub-model exchanges parameters via a shared data layer, enabling recursive interactions among economic input, land-use change, and mobility patterns. The framework advances urban carbon modeling through three key innovations. First, it establishes an investment-carbon elasticity mechanism that quantifies how capital concentration influences spatial emission patterns. Second, it formulates a rule-based symbolic coupling algorithm that enables cross-model parameter updating during iteration. Third, it develops a feedback-controlled carbon evaluation process that transforms traditional PSS from descriptive visualization tools into predictive decision-support frameworks. Applied to a representative new urban district, the framework demonstrates effectiveness in identifying low-carbon planning strategies under varying investment-intensity scenarios. By integrating economic, spatial, and environmental dimensions into a unified analytical logic, this research provides a scalable foundation for quantitative decision-making in sustainable urban transitions and contributes a theoretical model applicable to broader regional and national carbon-neutral planning frameworks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.