ArticleNature communications2026
PGS Browser: a public platform for personalized polygenic score analysis and interpretation.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Polygenic scores (PGSs) quantify individual genetic susceptibility to complex diseases and can identify high-risk individuals well before clinical onset. Their clinical translation, however, requires population-based reference resources, standardized benchmarking, and accessible tools for translating individual scores into disease likelihood. In this article, we systematically evaluate 3168 PGS models, primarily from the PGS Catalog, in 473,681 FinnGen participants, placing all models on a common performance scale to enable cross-model and cross-trait comparison. For each PGS, we create ancestry-adjusted reference distributions, providing a biobank-scale resource for interpreting individual scores. We perform phenome-wide association studies for each PGS, identifying 439,070 significant phenotypic associations, demonstratin g that integrating multiple scores improves predictive performance for most complex diseases, and providing public access to 11 top-performing interactive time-to-event models. All resources are accessible through the PGS Browser ( pgs.nchigm.org ), which offers a population-aware framework for score interpretation and lays groundwork for the clinical application of PGSs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.