ReviewAdvances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.)2026
Stunting Reversal versus Regression to the Mean in Epidemiological Studies of Child Linear Growth in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.
Review in Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Time to Stop Focusing on Catch-Up Growth.Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Early childhood undernutrition in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) is marked by population-wide linear growth faltering, whereby most children grow in height more slowly than expected for their age and a relatively high proportion of children are classified as stunted based on a height-for-age z-score (HAZ) below -2. In epidemiological studies in LMICs, patterns of linear growth are often examined by longitudinal analyses of individual children's HAZ trajectories by age; in some studies, catch-up growth is defined as an upward HAZ threshold-crossing event such as recovery from stunting or stunting reversal (i.e., crossing from below to above HAZ = -2). In this Perspective, we question the suitability of this method of studying catch-up growth and highlight its susceptibility to regression to the mean (RTM), a statistical phenomenon whereby individuals with extreme values tend to move closer to the population mean at subsequent measurement timepoints. We use simulations of anthropometric datasets to demonstrate that upward HAZ threshold-crossing events (e.g., stunting reversal) are caused by RTM, and we discuss the advantages and pitfalls of other statistical methods to address RTM. In a scoping review of epidemiological studies of linear growth catch-up in LMICs (2004 to mid-2024; N = 69), we found that RTM was uncommonly mentioned (20%), and few studies (5/69; 7%) explicitly addressed RTM. In most studies (36/69; 52%), inferences about catch-up were based on methods that are at higher risk of RTM artifacts, namely by quantifying threshold-crossing events (n = 24) or by stratification of the sample by baseline size (n = 12). We conclude that more attention to RTM is needed in analyses of linear catch-up growth in LMICs. Published studies that used RTM artifact-prone measures should be remediated, and the use of HAZ threshold-crossing events such as stunting reversal should be avoided in future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.