ReviewDrugs2026
Developmental Progress and Future Potential for Inhaled Biologics in the Treatment of Respiratory Diseases.
Review in Drugs, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Inhaled biologics to treat lung diseases have an extensive history. This is counterbalanced by the limited products that have reached the commercialization stage of development despite the numerous disease states and targets that may be suitable for the delivery of proteins, peptides, or nucleic acid therapeutics. These opportunities are reviewed alongside current and past clinical and preclinical studies that highlight both successful and discontinued programs, providing key lessons for future development. Although there are physical, biological, and technical barriers that must be overcome to successfully deliver these relatively fragile moieties to the lung, there are commercial and clinical reasons why success has not always been realized. This review captures the current landscape of inhaled biologics, and as the field advances, we expect the inhaled route to expand rapidly given its distinct pharmacokinetic advantages for local lung diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.