Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42322487›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of microbiology & biotechnology2026

Plant growth-promoting endophytic bacteria enhance cucumber growth and yield in a two-year field trial.

Ahmad Mahmood, Waleed Asghar, Yuta Kobayashi, Ryota Kataoka

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of microbiology & biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ahmad MahmoodSchool of Interdisciplinary Engineering and Sciences (SINES), National University of Sciences and Technology (NUST), Islamabad, Pakistan. ahmad.mahmood@sines.nust.edu.pk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2263-0500
Waleed AsgharDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, 74078, USA.
Yuta KobayashiDepartment of Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Life & Environmental Sciences, University of Yamanashi, Yamanashi, 400-0016, Japan.
Ryota KataokaDepartment of Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Life & Environmental Sciences, University of Yamanashi, Yamanashi, 400-0016, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant growth-promoting (PGP) endophytic bacteria are known to benefit plant growth and crop yields in controlled environment experiments, but their efficacy under open-field conditions and over multiple seasons has rarely been validated. Here, we conducted a two-year (2018-2019) open-field trial in a randomized block design to test five individual endophytic bacterial strains (Strain 4 = Curtobacterium sp., Strain 72 = Brevibacillus sp., Strain 167 = Paenibacillus sp., Strain 193 = Bacillus sp., Strain 227 = Microbacterium sp.) applied as cucumber seed inoculants, with an uninoculated control. All five strains enhanced at least one growth or yield component, while strains 4 and 227 consistently produced significantly higher total fruit weight per plant than the uninoculated control in both years (p < 0.05, Tukey's HSD). Fruit number and average fruit weight were also improved in a strain- and year-dependent manner. This study represents the first two-season field validation of single-strain endophytic inoculants in cucumber. These results demonstrate consistent growth and yield benefits from endophytic bacteria and highlight their promise as sustainable biofertilizers for cucumber production under field conditions.

Indexed as

BacteriaCucumis sativusEndophytesPlant DevelopmentBacillusBrevibacillusFruitPaenibacillusPlant RootsSeedsSoil MicrobiologyBiofertilizerCucumberEndophytic bacteriaField trialPlant growth promotionYield

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.