ArticleWorld journal of microbiology & biotechnology2026
Plant growth-promoting endophytic bacteria enhance cucumber growth and yield in a two-year field trial.
Article in World journal of microbiology & biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Plant growth-promoting (PGP) endophytic bacteria are known to benefit plant growth and crop yields in controlled environment experiments, but their efficacy under open-field conditions and over multiple seasons has rarely been validated. Here, we conducted a two-year (2018-2019) open-field trial in a randomized block design to test five individual endophytic bacterial strains (Strain 4 = Curtobacterium sp., Strain 72 = Brevibacillus sp., Strain 167 = Paenibacillus sp., Strain 193 = Bacillus sp., Strain 227 = Microbacterium sp.) applied as cucumber seed inoculants, with an uninoculated control. All five strains enhanced at least one growth or yield component, while strains 4 and 227 consistently produced significantly higher total fruit weight per plant than the uninoculated control in both years (p < 0.05, Tukey's HSD). Fruit number and average fruit weight were also improved in a strain- and year-dependent manner. This study represents the first two-season field validation of single-strain endophytic inoculants in cucumber. These results demonstrate consistent growth and yield benefits from endophytic bacteria and highlight their promise as sustainable biofertilizers for cucumber production under field conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42322487What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.