ArticleInsights into imaging2026
Lobar-level radiomic clustering reveals background lung changes associated with lung cancer risk: a new perspective for early screening.
Article in Insights into imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe concept of field cancerization highlights spatially diffuse, pre-malignant changes in carcinogen-exposed lung tissue, yet current screening rarely captures such effects regionally. This exploratory study aims to quantify field cancerization via lobar-level radiomic clustering and assess its association with lung cancer risk in high-risk smokers. MATERIALS AND
methodsA total of 10,280 male current or former smokers (mean age, 62.1 ± 6.34 years) were enrolled from a high-risk population undergoing lung cancer screening. Unsupervised clustering of CT-derived radiomic features was performed for each lobe. A logistic regression-derived weighted spatial risk score was developed to quantify cumulative lobar risk. Cancer incidence associations were assessed after adjusting for polygenic risk and epidemiological factors, with stratified analyses by genetic risk and smoking duration.
resultsDistinct radiomic clusters were observed across all lobes, with the right upper lobe demonstrating a significantly higher lung cancer incidence in the high-risk cluster (0.997% vs 0.593%, p = 0.020). The weighted spatial risk score was independently associated with cancer risk (OR = 1.09, 95% CI: 1.02-1.16, p = 0.010). There was no significant interaction between the score and PRS (p = 0.938), suggesting a genetic background-independent effect. In stratified analysis, the score was significantly associated with lung cancer among long-term smokers (OR = 1.08, 95% CI: 1.00-1.17, p = 0.049), with a similar but nonsignificant trend in short-term smokers.
conclusionUnsupervised clustering of lobar radiomics reveals background pulmonary alterations, supporting field cancerization and the "seed-and-soil" hypothesis, and offers an exploratory imaging-based framework for cancer risk stratification in screening. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Unsupervised clustering of radiomic features at the pulmonary lobe level identified distinct background patterns associated with nodule and cancer incidence. A derived weighted lobe score was independently associated with lung cancer risk, especially among individuals with prolonged smoking histories. KEY POINTS: Lobar radiomic clustering identifies background lung changes related to cancer risk. Weighted lobe spatial risk score predicts lung cancer risk independently of genetic background. Longer smoking duration strengthens the link between lung damage and cancer risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.