ArticleNeuroinformatics2026
Increasing the Reliability of Functional Connectivity by Predicting Long-Scan Functional Connectivity based on Short-Scan Functional Connectivity: Model Exploration, Explanation, Validation, and Application.
Article in Neuroinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Reliability of variability and complexity measures for task and task-free BOLD fMRI.Human brain mapping · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Functional connectivity (FC) is a widely used metric in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) research. However, its reliability has long been a notable concern, especially in studies with small sample sizes. Previous research has demonstrated that FC derived from longer fMRI scans exhibits higher reliability, making the prediction of long-scan FC from existing short-scan FC data a feasible and promising approach. First, we constructed three general linear models (GLMs) to predict long-scan FC from short-scan FC data using the Human Connectome Project (HCP) dataset. Next, we interpreted the models by visualizing their weight distributions. Subsequently, we validated our findings across multiple independent datasets and with different machine learning models. Finally, we applied the models to enhance both the test-retest reliability of FC and the performance of connectome-based predictive modeling (CPM). Our results showed that GLMs based on individual short-scan FC successfully predicted individual long-scan FC values. Moreover, the differences between the three GLMs could be explained by the distinct distribution characteristics of the FC matrices they predicted. Our findings were validated using data from the Consortium for Reliability and Reproducibility (CoRR) project and an in-house local dataset. Additionally, our models outperformed conventional machine learning approaches. Critically, these models effectively improved both the test-retest reliability of FC and the predictive performance of CPM. In conclusion, GLMs built on individual short-scan FC can robustly predict individual long-scan FC values. These models show strong generalizability across different datasets, and can be widely applied to improve the test-retest reliability of FC and the performance of CPM in neuroimaging studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42322480What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.