Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42322469›Full record

ArticleJournal of psycholinguistic research2026

Optimal Linguistic Input for Verb Learning in Young Spanish Learners: Single-word Utterances vs Multi-word Utterances.

Cynthia Pamela Audisio

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of psycholinguistic research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Cynthia Pamela AudisioFacultad de Filosofía y Letras, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina. cpaudisio@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8691-4257

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The acquisition of verbs has long puzzled researchers in language development. Competing hypotheses address whether single-word utterances (SWUs) or multi-word utterances (MWUs) are more effective for early verb learning, with some accounts arguing that encountering words-and verbs in particular-in isolation has benefits (e.g., Brent & Siskind, 2001; Grimm et al., 2019; Lew-Williams et al., 2011; Ninio, 2015, 2016). This study examines the impact of verb uses in SWUs and MWUs on verb acquisition in Spanish-learning children aged 1;6 to 3;0. Longitudinal data from naturalistic interactions across nine CHILDES corpora were analyzed to assess the distribution of SWUs and MWUs, revealing that SWUs are overall less frequent and decrease with age. Study 1 modeled children's actual verb production as a function of input characteristics, showing that verbs appearing more frequently in SWUs were produced by a greater number of children over time-an effect that held across age intervals. In addition, verbs occurring more frequently in MWUs were initially less likely to emerge in the population, although this inhibitory effect diminished with age. Study 2, based on Spanish CDI data, revealed a different pattern: the proportion of verb uses in SWUs or MWUs did not independently predict verb production but instead moderated other effects, with MWUs favoring production at older ages, particularly for more frequent verbs. Thus, despite their relative infrequency in children's input, SWUs appear to play a crucial role in early verb learning, as evidenced by children's production data. CDI results further suggest that MWUs may become increasingly beneficial as children age; however, this finding warrants further investigation. Overall, these results contribute to ongoing discussions about optimal input conditions for early verb acquisition.

Indexed as

Child LanguageLanguage DevelopmentLearningPsycholinguisticsVerbal LearningVocabularyChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantLongitudinal StudiesMaleLinguistic inputMultiword utterancesSingle word utterancesSpanishVerb acquisition

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.