ArticleExperimental brain research2026
The effect of auditory cues on heading direction during stepping-in-place in healthy adults with experimentally induced vestibular asymmetry.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Visual, vestibular, and proprioceptive cues are known to influence the orientation of our body in space. Auditory cues also influence spatial orientation, as recent studies shown they affect static postural balance. However, the influence of auditory stimulation on dynamic postural balance tasks, such as heading direction during vestibular perturbation, remains understudied. To examine the influence of auditory cues on heading direction during a stepping-in-place task with and without galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS). Twenty young healthy participants performed a stepping-in-place task, blindfolded with the head tilted forward to produce a GVS-evoked yaw rotation signal, with instructions to maintain the starting body position/orientation. The task was repeated under two auditory conditions (no sound or with sound) and three vestibular conditions (NoGVS, anode left, and anode right). Participants were divided equally according to instructions regarding the sound source position. Pelvis angular deviation relative to the sound source was measured using motion capture. The angular deviation error at the end of the trial and its variability with and without sound were calculated and analysed. Without GVS, auditory cues failed to reduce the angular deviation error of the pelvis rotation and its variability. Additionally, left and right GVS significantly increased pelvis angular deviation toward the anodal side compared to NoGVS. However, GVS-induced angular deviation did not differ with and without sound. Even though vestibular cues have been shown to significantly contribute to orientation in the absence of vision, auditory cues could not help maintaining heading direction during a stepping-in-place task, both under normal conditions and following acute vestibular perturbation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.