Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42322415›Full record

ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2026

Development of a conceptual, HOV-inspired spatial weighting model for quantifying geographic atrophy severity.

Shinichiro Chujo, Alberto Quarta, Rouzbeh Abbasgholizadeh, Yu-Chien Chung, Hyunduck Kwak, Ceren Soylu, Mai Alhelaly, Raiyna Rattu, Jianfeng Huang, Giulia Corradetti and 4 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Shinichiro ChujoDoheny Eye Institute, Pasadena, CA, USA.
Alberto QuartaDoheny Eye Institute, Pasadena, CA, USA.
Rouzbeh AbbasgholizadehDoheny Eye Institute, Pasadena, CA, USA.
Yu-Chien ChungDoheny Eye Institute, Pasadena, CA, USA.
Hyunduck KwakDoheny Eye Institute, Pasadena, CA, USA.
Ceren SoyluDoheny Eye Institute, Pasadena, CA, USA.
Mai AlhelalyDoheny Eye Institute, Pasadena, CA, USA.
Raiyna RattuDoheny Eye Institute, Pasadena, CA, USA.
Jianfeng HuangDoheny Eye Institute, Pasadena, CA, USA.
Giulia CorradettiDoheny Eye Institute, Pasadena, CA, USA.
Swetha VelagaDoheny Eye Institute, Pasadena, CA, USA.
Muneeswar Gupta NittalaDoheny Eye Institute, Pasadena, CA, USA.
Akihito UjiUji Eye Clinic, Yokkaichi City, Mie, Japan.
Srinivas R SaddaDoheny Eye Institute, Pasadena, CA, USA. ssadda@doheny.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo develop a Hill of Vision (HOV)-inspired severity score for geographic atrophy (GA) and evaluate its ability to capture spatial characteristics of disease progression, including lesion location and proximity to the foveal center, compared with the conventional lesion area (ΔArea) metric.

methodsThis retrospective analysis included 103 untreated fellow eyes from the MAHALO study with fundus autofluorescence images available at all visits. GA lesions were delineated and binarized to generate mask images. A Gaussian weighting function based on the distance from the foveal center was applied to each lesion pixel to model the spatial distribution of retinal functional resolution, yielding a volumetric "severity score," that was kept unitless for the purpose of this exercise. For eyes with multifocal GA, total severity was defined as the sum of all lesion values. The correlation between ΔArea and ΔSeverity (0-18 months) was assessed using Pearson's coefficient. Lesion expansion direction was visualized using Euclidean distance maps.

resultsMean changes in ΔArea and ΔSeverity over 18 months were 1.02 ± 1.11 mm² and 5811 ± 4584, respectively. A weak but significant correlation was observed (r = 0.36, p < 0.01). Cases with peripheral enlargement showed modest severity increases, whereas parafoveal expansion caused steep severity rises despite relatively minimal area growth. Expansion maps revealed that the direction and expansion to the fovea strongly influenced severity progression.

conclusionsThe HOV-inspired severity score provides a spatially weighted framework for assessing GA progression and may complement conventional structural metrics by incorporating lesion location relative to the fovea.

Indexed as

Age-related macular degenerationFundus autofluorescenceGeographic atrophyHill of visionImaging biomarkers

Identifiers

PMID42322415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.