ArticleSurgery today2026
Clinical significance of the C-reactive protein-albumin-lymphocyte index in older patients with colorectal cancer.
Article in Surgery today, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to investigate the association between the C-reactive protein-albumin-lymphocyte (CALLY) index and long-term prognosis and postoperative complications in older patients with colorectal cancer (CRC).
methodsThree hundred three patients with pathological stage (pStage) I-III CRC who underwent curative surgery at our institution between 2015 and 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients aged ≥ 75 years were defined as older.
resultsIn the overall cohort, a low CALLY index was an independent prognostic factor (hazard ratio (HR) = 2.42, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.31-4.47, p = 0.004). The age-stratified analysis revealed that a low CALLY index was associated with a worse prognosis and was an independent prognostic factor in older patients (HR = 3.46, 95% CI: 1.44-8.30, p = 0.005), whereas no independent prognostic significance was observed in non-older patients. Moreover, although the CALLY index was not associated with postoperative complications in non-older patients, a low CALLY index was an independent risk factor for postoperative complications in older patients (odds ratio = 3.93, 95% CI 1.49-10.3, p = 0.005).
conclusionThe CALLY index is a valuable predictor of both short- and long-term outcomes in patients with pStage I-III CRC, with a particularly strong impact on older patients aged ≥ 75 years.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42322406What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.