Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42322373›Full record

ArticleAMB Express2026

Bacterial community and functional prediction differences between white and red sour soup.

Runcheng Zhou, Wenjing Zhang, Kecan Chen, Zhiteng Lin, Xumei Yi, Jingwei Pan, Xin Chen, Anping Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AMB Express, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Runcheng Zhou *Department of Clinical Laboratory Technology, School of Medicine, Foshan University, Foshan, 528225, Guangdong Province, China.
Wenjing Zhang *Department of Clinical Laboratory Technology, School of Medicine, Foshan University, Foshan, 528225, Guangdong Province, China.
Kecan Chen *Department of Stomatology, School of Medicine, Foshan University, Foshan, 528225, Guangdong Province, China.
Zhiteng LinDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Technology, School of Medicine, Foshan University, Foshan, 528225, Guangdong Province, China.
Xumei YiDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Technology, School of Medicine, Foshan University, Foshan, 528225, Guangdong Province, China.
Jingwei PanDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Technology, School of Medicine, Foshan University, Foshan, 528225, Guangdong Province, China.
Xin ChenDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Technology, School of Medicine, Foshan University, Foshan, 528225, Guangdong Province, China. chenxin1210@163.com.
Anping YangDepartment of Pharmacy, School of Medicine, Foshan University, Foshan, 528225, Guangdong Province, China. foshanyap@fosu.edu.cn.

Funding

Academic Fund of Foshan University No. xsjj202519zrc15Foshan Academic-Industry Technology Transfer Support Program No. 2024SWYY05Foshan Science and Technology Innovation Project No. 2320001007450Foshan University Laboratory Open Innovation Fund No. KFCX2025-B10Guangdong Regional Joint Fund-Regional Cultivation Project 2022A1515140145
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sour soup is a traditional plant-based fermented food from Qiandongnan Prefecture, Guizhou Province, China. It is divided into two types: white sour soup and red sour soup. White sour soup is made by semi-anaerobic fermentation of oryza sativa var. glutinosa washing water in earthenware jars for 7-10 days. Red sour soup is prepared by crushing and mixing solanum lycopersicum, red capsicum annuum, and zingiber officinale with oryza sativa var. glutinosa washing water at a ratio of 3:1:0.5:5, followed by semi-anaerobic fermentation for 10-15 days. To date, no study has systematically compared the bacterial community and functional differences between the two types of sour soup. In this study, six samples of each type were analyzed by 16 S rRNA gene sequencing and PICRUSt2 functional prediction. The results showed that their community structures were significantly separated (p < 0.05). White sour soup was dominated by Proteobacteria (93.66%) and enriched with Lactobacillus (LDA = 3.63), Acetobacter (LDA = 5.67), and Clostridiales (LDA = 4.21). Red sour soup exhibited higher diversity, with Proteobacteria decreasing to 39.09% and co-existing with multiple other phyla including Chloroflexota (19.72%), and specifically enriched with Akkermansia (LDA = 4.26). Functionally, white sour soup showed higher predicted abundances in host circulatory system (FC = 3.26, p < 0.001) and host immune system (FC = 1.65, p < 0.01) pathways, whereas red sour soup showed higher abundance in the host digestive system pathway (FC = 0.46, p < 0.01). This study systematically reveals, for the first time, raw material-driven bacterial differentiation and provides a theoretical foundation for the functional development of traditional fermented foods.

Indexed as

16S rRNABacterial communityFunctional predictionSour soup

Identifiers

PMID42322373
PMCPMC13562456

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.