Automated

Daniel A Taylor, James McCall, Fraser Hill-Casey, Jonathan Hedges, Izzy Hehir, Gregory J Yule, Stuart Murray, Abigail Mortimer, Meghan E Halse

Abstract read

PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher

In one paragraph

Article in Analytical chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Daniel A TaylorDepartment of Chemistry, University of York, Heslington, York, North Yorkshire YO10 5DD, U.K.ORCID 0000-0002-5096-003X

James McCallDepartment of Chemistry, University of York, Heslington, York, North Yorkshire YO10 5DD, U.K.

Fraser Hill-CaseyDepartment of Chemistry, University of York, Heslington, York, North Yorkshire YO10 5DD, U.K.

Jonathan HedgesResearch IT, University of York, Heslington, York, North Yorkshire YO10 5DD, U.K.

Izzy HehirDepartment of Chemistry, University of York, Heslington, York, North Yorkshire YO10 5DD, U.K.

Gregory J YuleDepartment of Chemistry, University of York, Heslington, York, North Yorkshire YO10 5DD, U.K.

Stuart MurrayDepartment of Chemistry, University of York, Heslington, York, North Yorkshire YO10 5DD, U.K.

Abigail MortimerDepartment of Chemistry, University of York, Heslington, York, North Yorkshire YO10 5DD, U.K.

Meghan E HalseDepartment of Chemistry, University of York, Heslington, York, North Yorkshire YO10 5DD, U.K.ORCID 0000-0002-3605-5551

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Benchtop NMR spectroscopy is an affordable and accessible technique for mixture analysis but suffers from lower sensitivity and increased signal overlap compared to standard high-field NMR. Signal amplification by reversible exchange (SABRE) hyperpolarization can effectively address the sensitivity limitation, with automation of the hyperpolarization step enabling the multistep NMR experiments required to resolve signal overlap for complex mixture analysis. The automated workflow presented herein delivers highly repeatable hyperpolarization (with a 2.5% relative standard deviation in signal enhancement across 100 experiments) and can be integrated into any NMR pulse sequence with typical repolarization times of ∼13 s. Using this approach, a fully resolved

Identifiers

PMID42322261

DOI10.1021/acs.analchem.6c01237

PMCPMC13325455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.