ReviewInternational wound journal2026
Sinuhe Classification for Pretibial Injuries: Categorising Dermatoporotic Wounds.
Review in International wound journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pretibial injuries manifest as lacerations or haematomas. Despite differences in pathogenesis and treatment, these entities have been mixed together in previous classifications. No classification for pretibial haematomas exists, and the Modified Dunkin Classification includes a Type V category that conflates lacerations with haematomas. To present the Sinuhe Classification-a comprehensive system categorising pretibial lacerations and haematomas with evidence-based treatment recommendations-and propose the umbrella term 'dermatoporotic wounds' to encompass the full spectrum of cutaneous injuries arising from chronic skin fragility. A narrative literature review of PubMed, MEDLINE and EMBASE was conducted. Treatment recommendations and clinical findings were synthesised from the available literature, including a doctoral thesis on pretibial injuries. The Sinuhe Classification categorises pretibial lacerations into linear lacerations; flap lacerations (vital, i.e., with adequate perfusion and non-vital, i.e., with flap necrosis); and total skin loss. Pretibial haematomas are classified into open (ruptured), closed and necrotic haematomas. Each subtype is paired with specific treatment guidance. The classification eliminates the Modified Dunkin Type V category and provides a classification framework for pretibial haematomas. The Sinuhe Classification offers a unified yet distinct framework for diagnosing and treating pretibial injuries. Adoption into clinical practice and medical education is recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.