Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42322182›Full record

ReviewInternational wound journal2026

Sinuhe Classification for Pretibial Injuries: Categorising Dermatoporotic Wounds.

Toni Seppälä, Vahur Grünthal, Virve Koljonen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International wound journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Toni SeppäläDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5379-3022
Vahur GrünthalDepartment of Surgery, Kymenlaakso Central Hospital, KYMSOTE, Kotka, Finland.
Virve KoljonenDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pretibial injuries manifest as lacerations or haematomas. Despite differences in pathogenesis and treatment, these entities have been mixed together in previous classifications. No classification for pretibial haematomas exists, and the Modified Dunkin Classification includes a Type V category that conflates lacerations with haematomas. To present the Sinuhe Classification-a comprehensive system categorising pretibial lacerations and haematomas with evidence-based treatment recommendations-and propose the umbrella term 'dermatoporotic wounds' to encompass the full spectrum of cutaneous injuries arising from chronic skin fragility. A narrative literature review of PubMed, MEDLINE and EMBASE was conducted. Treatment recommendations and clinical findings were synthesised from the available literature, including a doctoral thesis on pretibial injuries. The Sinuhe Classification categorises pretibial lacerations into linear lacerations; flap lacerations (vital, i.e., with adequate perfusion and non-vital, i.e., with flap necrosis); and total skin loss. Pretibial haematomas are classified into open (ruptured), closed and necrotic haematomas. Each subtype is paired with specific treatment guidance. The classification eliminates the Modified Dunkin Type V category and provides a classification framework for pretibial haematomas. The Sinuhe Classification offers a unified yet distinct framework for diagnosing and treating pretibial injuries. Adoption into clinical practice and medical education is recommended.

Indexed as

HematomaLacerationsLeg InjuriesFemaleHumansMaleWound Healingchronic leg ulcersclassificationdermatoporosisdermatoporotic woundspretibial haematomaspretibial injuriespretibial lacerationswound management

Identifiers

PMID42322182
PMCPMC13282688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.