Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42322166›Full record

ArticleFamily process2026

Behaviors Associated With Improved Relationship Satisfaction: Examining Change in the Relationship Checkup.

Erica A Mitchell, Patricia N E Roberson, Desirée S Woodle, James V Cordova, Kristina Coop Gordon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Family process, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Erica A MitchellDepartment of Human Development and Family Studies, Michigan State University, Lansing, Michigan, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1923-753X
Patricia N E RobersonCollege of Nursing, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA.
Desirée S WoodleDepartment of Psychology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7196-6257
James V CordovaDepartment of Psychology, Clark University, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA.
Kristina Coop GordonCollege of Education, Health, and Human Sciences, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA.

Funding

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 90FM0022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Relationship distress and dissolution are reported by about one-third of couples in the United States. Despite evidence that couple therapy is an effective treatment for relationship distress, many couples encounter barriers (e.g., cost, time, transportation, childcare) to accessing this kind of relationship help. The Relationship Checkup is a two-session, individualized intervention where each couple receives evidence-based suggestions to address specific relationship concerns. The Relationship Checkup was delivered as a home visitation intervention in the Southeastern region of the United States. The current study (N = 1298 individuals; N = 649 couples) uses Dyadic Latent Growth Curves models to examine associations between short-term (i.e., pre-intervention to 1-month post-intervention) change in an indicator of relationship quality (i.e., constructive communication, intimate safety, and relationship aggression) and longer-term change (i.e., pre-intervention to 6-months post-intervention) in relationship satisfaction. Specifically, we examine how change in one's own indicator of relationship quality influences changes in one's own and one's partner's relationship satisfaction. Across all indicators of relationship quality, short-term change for Partner A (i.e., the partner who requested the Relationship Checkup) is associated with longer-term change in satisfaction for self and partner. For Partner B, short-term change in each indicator is associated with longer-term change in satisfaction for self, but not for partner. Supplemental analyses indicate improvements are generally maintained for relationship aggression, while improvements for intimate safety and constructive communication generally decelerate following the intervention. Attuning to the identified areas of concern for the partner requesting the Relationship Checkup may be an effective approach to practice.

Indexed as

Couples TherapyInterpersonal RelationsPersonal SatisfactionAdultCommunicationFemaleHumansMalebrief interventioncouplesrelationship satisfaction

Identifiers

PMID42322166
PMCPMC13282717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.