ArticleThe New phytologist2026
Flow similarity model characterizes hydraulic-mechanical trade-offs driving size-dependent allometric scaling across branch orders in oak trees.
Article in The New phytologist, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Allometry is central to understanding resource allocation strategies in plant development, with branching networks serving as critical determinants of allometric scaling patterns. While current theoretical models propose frameworks for allometric variation, empirical evidence supporting their assumptions is limited. Here, we measured the branching architecture of 191 oak (Quercus and Lithocarpus) branches across different light and altitude environments, analyzed the relationship between branching structure and allometric scaling exponents, and examined size-dependent variation in scaling exponents via quadratic fitting. Our study reveals that the branch diameter scale factor a remains stable (a = 1/2), aligning precisely with the West-Brown-Enquist (WBE) model and Flow Similarity (FS) model predictions of constant flow velocity, whereas the length scale factor b significantly exceeds WBE predictions (b > 1/3). The FS model is further validated in explaining the continuous decline in length-diameter allometric scaling exponents from terminal twigs to entire branches via hydraulic-mechanical trade-offs, whereas exponents calculated from the Price-Enquist-Savage equations were significantly different from SMA-fitted exponents. Light intensity significantly regulates size-dependent variation in allometric scaling exponents, while altitude effects are limited. Our findings advance understanding of how woody plant allometries vary across branch orders, helping to clarify the hydraulic-mechanical trade-off mechanisms underlying this process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.