Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42322097›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of dermatology2026

Platelet-Rich Plasma Therapy for Refractory Skin Ulcers: A Case Series of 12 Patients and Concise Review of the Literature.

Teruhiko Makino, Keita Takemoto, Megumi Mizawa, Tadamichi Shimizu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of dermatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Teruhiko MakinoDepartment of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine, Academic Assembly, University of Toyama, Toyama, Toyama, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0536-1679
Keita TakemotoDepartment of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine, Academic Assembly, University of Toyama, Toyama, Toyama, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3036-1451
Megumi MizawaDepartment of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine, Academic Assembly, University of Toyama, Toyama, Toyama, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3348-3240
Tadamichi ShimizuDepartment of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine, Academic Assembly, University of Toyama, Toyama, Toyama, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic skin ulcers remain a significant therapeutic challenge, particularly in patients with underlying medical conditions, and often prove difficult to treat with conventional methods. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP), an autologous preparation rich in growth factors, has garnered attention as a promising treatment option; however, its clinical efficacy remains inconsistent. In this study, we retrospectively evaluated 12 patients with refractory skin ulcers who received PRP therapy between 2018 and 2023. PRP was prepared from the patients' own blood and administered once weekly for 4 weeks; treatment efficacy was assessed based on the rate of reduction in ulcer area. Clinical outcomes varied depending on the etiology of the ulcer. Marked improvement was observed in patients with livedoid vasculopathy and burn-related ulcers, whereas moderate to marked improvement was seen in diabetic ulcers only when peripheral blood flow was preserved. In contrast, the response was minimal or absent in ulcers associated with pressure ulcers or peripheral arterial disease. Importantly, no adverse events were observed during treatment. These findings suggest that PRP therapy is a safe and potentially effective option for refractory skin ulcers, particularly in non-ischemic conditions. However, its efficacy appears to be limited in wounds involving ischemia or mechanical injury, highlighting the importance of appropriate patient selection and wound condition optimization. Further studies using standardized protocols are necessary to clarify its clinical indications.

Indexed as

Platelet-Rich PlasmaSkin UlcerAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSkinTreatment OutcomeWound Healingburndiabetic ulcerischemic ulcerplatelet‐rich plasma therapyskin ulcer

Identifiers

PMID42322097
PMCPMC13435075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.