ReviewThe Journal of dermatology2026
Platelet-Rich Plasma Therapy for Refractory Skin Ulcers: A Case Series of 12 Patients and Concise Review of the Literature.
Review in The Journal of dermatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chronic skin ulcers remain a significant therapeutic challenge, particularly in patients with underlying medical conditions, and often prove difficult to treat with conventional methods. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP), an autologous preparation rich in growth factors, has garnered attention as a promising treatment option; however, its clinical efficacy remains inconsistent. In this study, we retrospectively evaluated 12 patients with refractory skin ulcers who received PRP therapy between 2018 and 2023. PRP was prepared from the patients' own blood and administered once weekly for 4 weeks; treatment efficacy was assessed based on the rate of reduction in ulcer area. Clinical outcomes varied depending on the etiology of the ulcer. Marked improvement was observed in patients with livedoid vasculopathy and burn-related ulcers, whereas moderate to marked improvement was seen in diabetic ulcers only when peripheral blood flow was preserved. In contrast, the response was minimal or absent in ulcers associated with pressure ulcers or peripheral arterial disease. Importantly, no adverse events were observed during treatment. These findings suggest that PRP therapy is a safe and potentially effective option for refractory skin ulcers, particularly in non-ischemic conditions. However, its efficacy appears to be limited in wounds involving ischemia or mechanical injury, highlighting the importance of appropriate patient selection and wound condition optimization. Further studies using standardized protocols are necessary to clarify its clinical indications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.