Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42322087›Full record

SynthesisPhytotherapy research : PTR2026

Treatment of Nausea and Vomiting With Zingiber officinale in Pregnancy: An Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews With Meta-Synthesis.

Zoya Tahergorabi, Mahdi Eslami, Morteza Arab-Zozani

Abstract readSystematic ReviewReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Phytotherapy research : PTR, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zoya TahergorabiDepartment of Physiology, School of Medicine, Geriatric Health Research Center, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7072-7454
Mahdi EslamiDepartment of Persian Medicine, School of Medicine, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1447-6945
Morteza Arab-ZozaniSocial Determinants of Health Research Center, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7223-6707

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Affecting approximately 85% of expectant mothers during the first trimester, nausea and vomiting of pregnancy (NVP) are frequently reported symptoms. Despite numerous existing systematic reviews and meta-analyses (SRMs), findings remain inconsistent. Consequently, this study assesses the quality of these prior SRMs and investigates the efficacy of ginger as a treatment for NVP. A comprehensive search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, and Web of Science from their inception through December 30, 2024. This review includes peer-reviewed English-language SRMs investigating ginger as a therapeutic intervention for pregnancy-related nausea and vomiting. Methodological rigor was evaluated using the AMSTAR-2 checklist, while evidence quality was assessed via the GRADE approach. Findings are synthesized narratively through content analysis. The study protocol was prospectively registered in the PROSPERO database. This study analyzed 18 systematic reviews, of which eight (44%) incorporated meta-analyses. The Rhodes Index of Nausea and Vomiting (RINV) emerged as the primary tool for evaluating outcomes. Regarding study reporting and transparency, seven studies registered their protocols in PROSPERO, while eight adhered to the PRISMA checklist. Overall, the included reviews demonstrated low methodological quality, with a mean score of 11.77. Specifically, 28% (n = 5) were rated as high quality, 28% (n = 5) as moderate, 22% (n = 4) as low, and 22% (n = 4) as critically low. Taking ginger supplements (usually between 450 and 1950 mg daily) significantly decreases the severity and occurrence of nausea and vomiting compared to a placebo. This benefit is more noticeable for nausea than for vomiting, where the results are less consistent. Numerous studies have shown that ginger does not raise the risk of adverse effects, such as spontaneous abortion or side effects like heartburn and drowsiness, when compared to a placebo or vitamin B6. Current evidence clearly shows that ginger is a safe and effective treatment for nausea and vomiting during pregnancy, with effectiveness similar to vitamin B6 and some traditional medications, and it has a good safety profile. Ginger can be recommended as a dependable medicinal herb for women dealing with NVP, though more research is needed to determine the best doses and confirm long-term safety.

Indexed as

NauseaPhytotherapyPlant ExtractsPregnancy ComplicationsVomitingZingiber officinaleFemaleHumansMeta-Analysis as TopicPregnancySystematic Reviews as TopicPlant Extractsnauseapregnancysystematic reviewvomitingZingiber officinale

Identifiers

PMID42322087
PMCPMC13549022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.