ArticleJournal of nursing management2026
Longitudinal Interplay Between Team Resilience and Team Stress in Low-Stability Clinical Nursing Teams: A Cross-Lagged Panel Network Analysis.
Article in Journal of nursing management, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Longitudinal Interplay Between Team Resilience and Team Stress in Low-Stability Clinical Nursing Teams: A Cross-Lagged Panel Network Analysis.Journal of nursing management · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimTo estimate longitudinal predictive relationships between team resilience and team stress among low-stability clinical nursing teams, identifying core driving factors and bridging mechanisms using cross-lagged panel network analysis.
backgroundChronic instability in clinical nursing teams disrupts workflows and triggers systemic team stress, which is further exacerbated by digital health technology burdens and moral distress. Understanding how specific dimensions of team resilience interact with these facets of team stress over time is essential for developing precise organizational interventions.
designA two-wave longitudinal panel study.
methodsData from the Nurse Team Health Management Research Cohort across two waves (October 2024 and December 2025) included 5164 clinical nurses aggregated into 285 low-stability nurse teams. Team resilience and team stress were assessed using the Analyzing and Developing Adaptability and Performance in Teams to Enhance Resilience Scale and a customized Nursing Job Stressor Inventory. A cross-lagged panel network was estimated to identify influential nodes and network conduits.
resultsDigital health technology burden exhibited the highest predictive power, driving team stress and significantly predicting subsequent moral distress. Moral distress emerged as a potentially destructive bridge, which may negatively predict multiple resilience dimensions over time. Conversely, cooperation with other departments appeared to serve as a protective bridge, mitigating subsequent subjective work stress and digital technology burden. Monitoring exhibited a potentially paradoxical effect, positively predicting subsequent subjective work stress.
conclusionDigital health technology burden drives occupational stress in low-stability nursing teams. Moral distress may erode team resilience, whereas cross-departmental cooperation acts as a potential protective shield. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: This study shifts the focus of occupational stress management from the individual to the team level. To stabilize nursing teams facing chronic instability and high turnover, healthcare administrators should move beyond generic stress reduction. Targeted interventions must focus on alleviating digital workflow burdens, instituting routine ethical debriefings to resolve moral distress, and formalizing boundary-spanning cooperation protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.