ArticleAutism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research2026
Valence-Arousal Asymmetry: Rethinking Facial Emotion Recognition in Preschool Autism Through Eye-Tracking.
Article in Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Facial emotion recognition is a fundamental socioemotional skill often impaired in autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Yet findings remain inconsistent, partly due to reliance on discrete emotion categories that neglect affective dimensions. Guided by a valence-arousal framework, this study re-examined facial emotion recognition in preschool children with ASD using eye-tracking and pupilometry. Eighty-two Chinese preschoolers (40 ASD, 42 typically developing [TD]) completed an emotion recognition task with facial stimuli systematically varied in valence (positive vs. negative) and arousal (high vs. low). Eye movements and pupil size were analyzed within a 2 (group) × 2 (valence) × 2 (arousal) × 4 (AOI: eyes, nose, mouth, other) design. Results showed robust effects of valence: TD children allocated more fixations and longer gaze to positive faces, especially the eye region, whereas ASD children showed attenuated patterns. Arousal effects were weaker but interacted with valence, with high-arousal negative faces eliciting avoidance and high-arousal positive faces enhancing pupil responses. These findings highlight valence-arousal asymmetry as a key mechanism underlying atypical emotion processing in preschool ASD and underscore the value of dimensional approaches for early socioemotional assessment and intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.