Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42322033›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of methods in psychiatric research2026

Group, Subgroup and Person-Specific Longitudinal Associations Between Physical Activity and Affect in Individuals With and Without Depressive and Anxiety Disorders.

Noa van Zwieten, George Aalbers, Femke Lamers, Harriëtte Riese, Manon H J Hillegers, Brenda W J H Penninx

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of methods in psychiatric research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Noa van ZwietenDepartment of Psychiatry, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-3130-8687
George AalbersDepartment of Psychiatry, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7140-1536
Femke LamersDepartment of Psychiatry, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4344-5766
Harriëtte RieseDepartment of Psychiatry, Clinical Cognitive Neuro-Psychiatry (CCNP), University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3661-3151
Manon H J HillegersDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry/Psychology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4877-282X
Brenda W J H PenninxDepartment of Psychiatry, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7779-9672

Funding

Ministerie van Onderwijs, Cultuur en Wetenschap 024.005.010Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek 024.005.010
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesAssociations between physical activity and affect (activity-affect dynamics) vary among individuals for which reasons remain unclear. We examined whether such heterogeneity is explained by psychiatric status or sociodemographic, clinical, and ambulatory assessment characteristics.

methodsTwo-week ambulatory assessment data of 300 participants with current (n = 79), subthreshold (n = 67), and no (n = 154) depressive and/or anxiety disorders or symptoms were obtained from the Netherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety. Positive and negative affect (PA/NA) were assessed with ecological momentary assessment (5xdaily) and physical activity using actigraphy. Group iterative multiple model estimation was used to model associations shared across the sample, psychiatric subgroups, and those specific to individuals.

resultsNo activity-affect associations were shared across the sample (i.e., present in > 75% of all individuals) or psychiatric subgroups (i.e., present in > 51% of individuals within subgroups). Nevertheless, 45% of participants had at least one activity-affect association, with considerable heterogeneity in their nature. The most frequent association was a positive contemporaneous association between physical activity and PA (present in 25% of the sample).

conclusionsThese findings suggest large heterogeneity in activity-affect dynamics among individuals and underscore the importance of considering the unique dynamics of the individual.

Indexed as

AffectAnxiety DisordersDepressive DisorderExerciseActigraphyAdultEcological Momentary AssessmentFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsYoung Adultaffectambulatory assessmentanxietydepressionphysical activity

Identifiers

PMID42322033
PMCPMC13282464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.