ArticleTropical medicine & international health : TM & IH2026
Do Mobile Phone Surveys Supplement Other Mortality Surveillance Methods? Results From a National Study in Bangladesh.
Article in Tropical medicine & international health : TM & IH, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo test whether mobile phone surveys conducted remotely might generate data on deaths that are not covered by mortality surveillance systems established in laboratories and health facilities, or in institutions involved in the post-mortem management of corpses (e.g., morgues, cemeteries).
methodsWe conducted a national survey of mobile phone users in Bangladesh during the COVID-19 pandemic. Respondents were asked to list the deaths that had occurred in their household in recent years. For each death, they were also asked to indicate whether the deceased had been diagnosed with COVID-19 prior to death, whether the death occurred at home or at a health facility, and where the burial took place. Using these data, we represented the overlap between data generated by the mobile phone survey and several potential mortality surveillance systems, which focus on counting deaths in health facilities or communal cemeteries. We described the socio-demographic characteristics of the deaths that were uniquely recorded by the mobile phone survey.
resultsFrom December 2021 to July 2022, 506,659 calls were placed, resulting in 22,731 interviews completed by mobile phone. Respondents reported 1527 deaths that had occurred in their household since 2020. Among those deaths, 99 (6.5%) had received a pre-mortem diagnosis of COVID-19. The proportion of reported deaths that were not covered by other potential mortality surveillance systems, was 32.4% in the large city corporations of Dhaka and Chittagong, 36.3% in other urban areas and 49.6% in rural areas. In urban areas, deaths among men, as well as among youth and the elderly, were more likely to be covered solely by the mobile phone survey.
conclusionMobile phone surveys can potentially remedy gaps in the data generated by other recommended mortality surveillance methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.