Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42321991›Full record

ArticleJournal of forensic sciences2026

New York State's evidential oral fluid testing program.

Jennifer F Limoges, Dustin L Abbott, Dayna L McDonough, Seth J Tracy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of forensic sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jennifer F LimogesNew York State Police Forensic Investigation Center, Albany, New York, USA.
Dustin L AbbottNew York State Police Forensic Investigation Center, Albany, New York, USA.
Dayna L McDonoughNew York State Police Forensic Investigation Center, Albany, New York, USA.
Seth J TracyNew York State Police Forensic Investigation Center, Albany, New York, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oral fluid is a viable alternative to traditional sample matrices used in driving under the influence of drugs (DUID) casework. Oral fluid offers several advantages including rapid collection relative to the time of incident, ease of collection, and the ability to detect all routinely encountered drugs of abuse. In July of 2024, the New York State Police (NYSP) implemented a statewide evidentiary oral fluid program following the successful completion of a nine-month pilot study. The pilot consisted of 201 paired oral fluid-blood samples which showed an overall correlation rate of 96%. Ninety-three of the paired samples showed additional positives in the oral fluid that were not detected in the blood, including 21 6-acetylmorphine positives, making oral fluid especially valuable in the investigation of heroin use. In the first year of casework submissions following the pilot study, 703 oral fluid samples were submitted to the laboratory (27% of total samples), and this number has continued to rise as agencies throughout the state have embraced the new sample type. This article details the overall testing scheme and analytical methods used by the NYSP Forensic Investigation Center for the analysis of oral fluid, as well as blood testing methods in place during the pilot study. Data from the pilot program and the first year of oral fluid casework are presented, along with implementation strategies that engage all stakeholders. This may serve as a resource for other agencies looking to implement evidential oral fluid testing for DUID investigations.

Indexed as

NarcoticsSalivaSubstance Abuse DetectionCocaineDriving Under the InfluenceForensic ToxicologyGas Chromatography-Mass SpectrometryHumansMorphine DerivativesNew YorkPilot Projects6-O-monoacetylmorphineCocaineMorphine DerivativesNarcoticsblood‐oral fluid correlationdriving under the influence of drugs (DUID)forensic toxicologyoral fluidQuantisaltraffic safety

Identifiers

PMID42321991
PMCPMC13534961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.