ArticleOccupational therapy international2026
Occupational Formulation: A Scoping Review of Its Development and Use.
Article in Occupational therapy international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Occupational Formulation: A Scoping Review of Its Development and Use.Occupational therapy international · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionOccupational formulation offers a way to synthesise assessment information to understand a person's occupational participation and needs. Although increasingly recognised in professional guidelines, there has been limited exploration of its development and application in occupational therapy.
methodsA scoping review was conducted following Arksey and O'Malley's framework and PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Comprehensive searches were undertaken across five databases (AMED, CINAHL, Emcare, PsycInfo and Google Scholar), a global theses repository, and multiple grey literature sources. Inclusion criteria focused on English sources describing the use by occupational therapists of formulation or conceptualisation related to occupational concepts. One hundred and two eligible sources were identified, from which data were extracted, tabulated and synthesised narratively.
resultsThe reviewed sources spanned 2002-2025, mainly originating from the United Kingdom and United States, and mental health settings. Sources included some evaluations and practice reflections but limited empirical research. Four strands of occupational formulation development were identified: formulation associated with the Model of Human Occupation, descriptions of the occupational therapy practice process, psychological formulation approaches and bespoke occupational approaches. Identified key features of occupational formulation were as follows: its grounding in occupational theory, inclusion within the practice process between assessment and goal development/therapy planning, collaborative emphasis, narrative approach, provision of a structure and being an ongoing process. Reported purposes included synthesising assessment findings, supporting reasoning, supporting shared understanding and therapy planning, enhancing communication and promoting an occupational focus. Benefits for the person, therapeutic relationship, occupational therapist and team were reported. DISCUSSION: Occupational formulation is both a process and a written product that can strengthen occupational therapy practice by linking theory to practice, enhancing reasoning and supporting collaborative care. Definitions are proposed to support consistent use in research and practice.
conclusionOccupational formulation shows promise for enhancing occupational therapy practice. Further research should evaluate its effectiveness across diverse practice settings and populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.