Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42321960›Full record

ArticleOccupational therapy international2026

Occupational Formulation: A Scoping Review of Its Development and Use.

Lorrae Mynard, Ellie Fossey, Genevieve Pepin, Louise Farnworth

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Occupational therapy international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lorrae MynardDepartment of Occupational Therapy, Monash University, Frankston, Victoria, Australia, monash.ac.za.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2271-1746
Ellie FosseyDepartment of Occupational Therapy, Monash University, Frankston, Victoria, Australia, monash.ac.za.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8002-5763
Genevieve PepinOccupational Science and Therapy, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia, deakin.edu.au.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8382-160X
Louise FarnworthDepartment of Occupational Therapy, Monash University, Frankston, Victoria, Australia, monash.ac.za.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7740-4706

Funding

Australian Government Research Training Program ScholarshipCouncil of Australasian University LibrariansMonash University
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionOccupational formulation offers a way to synthesise assessment information to understand a person's occupational participation and needs. Although increasingly recognised in professional guidelines, there has been limited exploration of its development and application in occupational therapy.

methodsA scoping review was conducted following Arksey and O'Malley's framework and PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Comprehensive searches were undertaken across five databases (AMED, CINAHL, Emcare, PsycInfo and Google Scholar), a global theses repository, and multiple grey literature sources. Inclusion criteria focused on English sources describing the use by occupational therapists of formulation or conceptualisation related to occupational concepts. One hundred and two eligible sources were identified, from which data were extracted, tabulated and synthesised narratively.

resultsThe reviewed sources spanned 2002-2025, mainly originating from the United Kingdom and United States, and mental health settings. Sources included some evaluations and practice reflections but limited empirical research. Four strands of occupational formulation development were identified: formulation associated with the Model of Human Occupation, descriptions of the occupational therapy practice process, psychological formulation approaches and bespoke occupational approaches. Identified key features of occupational formulation were as follows: its grounding in occupational theory, inclusion within the practice process between assessment and goal development/therapy planning, collaborative emphasis, narrative approach, provision of a structure and being an ongoing process. Reported purposes included synthesising assessment findings, supporting reasoning, supporting shared understanding and therapy planning, enhancing communication and promoting an occupational focus. Benefits for the person, therapeutic relationship, occupational therapist and team were reported. DISCUSSION: Occupational formulation is both a process and a written product that can strengthen occupational therapy practice by linking theory to practice, enhancing reasoning and supporting collaborative care. Definitions are proposed to support consistent use in research and practice.

conclusionOccupational formulation shows promise for enhancing occupational therapy practice. Further research should evaluate its effectiveness across diverse practice settings and populations.

Indexed as

Occupational TherapyHumans

Identifiers

PMID42321960
PMCPMC13282183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.