ArticleGenome medicine2026
Microbial cell-free DNA for rapid pathogen identification in clinical diagnostics: a proof of concept study.
Article in Genome medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Microbial cell-free DNA for rapid pathogen identification in clinical diagnostics: a proof of concept study.Genome medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microbial cell-free DNA (mcfDNA) enables rapid and sensitive pathogen detection via direct plasma-sequencing. Here, we present a fast, cost-effective mcfDNA multiplex workflow to complement or improve the sensitivity of microbiological diagnostics for systemic and focal infections which can be challenged by prior antibiotic treatment or non-culturable pathogens. In an explorative study of 18 patients, mcfDNA sequencing matched the clinical diagnosis in 16 cases (89%), was detected up to 16 days after starting targeted antibiotic therapy and identified Staphylococcus aureus in two cases of culture-negative endocarditis. By providing an open-access protocol, we aim to promote broader accessibility and globally available application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.