Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42321927›Full record

ArticleNeurological research and practice2026

Unmet needs in the care of patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody associated disease: insights from Germany.

Katrin Giglhuber, Alix Bertrand, Clarissa Zappe, Ingo Kleiter, Ilya Ayzenberg, Achim Berthele, Neuromyelitis Optica Study Group (NEMOS)

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurological research and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Katrin GiglhuberDepartment of Neurology, TUM University Hospital, School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, Munich, 81675, Germany. katrin.giglhuber@tum.de.
Alix BertrandDepartment of Neurology, TUM University Hospital, School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, Munich, 81675, Germany.
Clarissa ZappeDepartment of Neurology, TUM University Hospital, School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, Munich, 81675, Germany.
Ingo KleiterMarianne-Strauss-Klinik, Berg, Germany.
Ilya AyzenbergRuhr University Bochum, St. Josef Hospital, Department of Neurology, Bochum, Germany.
Achim BertheleDepartment of Neurology, TUM University Hospital, School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, Munich, 81675, Germany.
Neuromyelitis Optica Study Group (NEMOS)

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNeuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease (MOGAD) are rare autoimmune disorders. Their true prevalence in Germany is unknown and can only be estimated from heterogeneous international data. Assuming 1-3 cases per 100,000 people for each disease suggests several thousand affected individuals nationwide, yet the German Neuromyelitis Optica Study Group (NEMOS) registry currently holds records of only about 1,300 patients seen in specialised centres. Numbers and care structures outside such facilities remain largely unknown. This survey aimed to assess the current state of NMOSD and MOGAD care in Germany, identify gaps, and inform future care strategies.

methodsAn online questionnaire aimed at neurologists and neuropaediatricians was distributed via NEMOS, the German Neurological Society (DGN), the Professional Association of German Neurologists (BVDN), and the German Network for Research on Autoimmune Encephalitis (GENERATE) from March to May 2025. Questions addressed care structures, diagnostics, coding, treatment, guideline use, and practitioners' needs.

resultsA total of 104 physicians from all German federal states participated. Half worked in university hospitals, the remainder in other clinics and outpatient settings. Most were specialised in neuroimmunology (70.2%). Many reported an increase in patient numbers for NMOSD (55.8%) and MOGAD (77.4%). Diagnostic practices revealed significant inconsistencies: almost half of the respondents were unaware of their referral laboratory's antibody assays, and ELISA remained in use despite clear recommendations for cell-based assays. ICD-10 coding varied widely. Off-label rituximab was most frequently used for first-line therapy of AQP4-antibody-positive NMOSD (69.6%), compared to satralizumab (57.1%), ravulizumab (55.4%) and inebilizumab (50.0%). AQP4-antibody-negative NMOSD was mainly treated with rituximab (87.0%). Also in MOGAD, rituximab was frequently used (by 58.9%), yet paediatricians preferred glucocorticoids and intravenous immunoglobulins. 69.6% initiated treatment for MOGAD after the first attack. Notably, 41.8% of physicians reported untreated NMOSD and 64.6% untreated MOGAD patients. Most respondents relied on national guidelines; 43.2% expressed a need for further education and patient information.

conclusionsOur findings highlight substantial heterogeneity in the diagnosis and treatment of NMOSD and MOGAD in Germany with potential implications for patient outcomes. This underscores the need for harmonised procedures and targeted educational resources to improve diagnostic reliability, treatment equity, and overall quality of care.

Indexed as

Healthcare provider surveyMOGADNMOSDPatient careReal-World setting

Identifiers

PMID42321927
PMCPMC13282859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.