Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42321905›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2026

Mosquito-based xenosurveillance reveals circulation of Anaplasma and Neoehrlichia in livestock at a human-wildlife interface in Kenya.

Dennis Getange, Samson Mukaratirwa, Oscar Esibi, Epaphrus Yuko, James Kabii, Rua Khogali, Jandouwe Villinger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Dennis GetangeInternational Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (icipe), P.O. Box 30772-00100, Nairobi, Kenya. dgetange21@gmail.com.
Samson MukaratirwaSchool of Agriculture and Science, Westville Campus, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Private Bag X54001, Durban, 4000, South Africa.
Oscar EsibiInternational Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (icipe), P.O. Box 30772-00100, Nairobi, Kenya.
Epaphrus YukoInternational Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (icipe), P.O. Box 30772-00100, Nairobi, Kenya.
James KabiiInternational Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (icipe), P.O. Box 30772-00100, Nairobi, Kenya.
Rua KhogaliInternational Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (icipe), P.O. Box 30772-00100, Nairobi, Kenya.
Jandouwe VillingerInternational Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (icipe), P.O. Box 30772-00100, Nairobi, Kenya. jandouwe@icipe.org.

Funding

Horizon 2020 Framework Programme 101000365
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundXenosurveillance, which uses blood-feeding insects as biological samplers, is an emerging non-invasive approach for monitoring pathogens circulating among humans, livestock, and wildlife. However, its application to livestock-associated bacterial pathogens at human-animal-wildlife interfaces remains underexplored. We investigated whether mosquito blood meals could be used to detect tick-borne bacterial pathogens circulating in livestock in Kenya.

methodsWe collected 4673 mosquitoes, belonging to Culex, Anopheles, Aedes, Mansonia, and Coquillettidia genera around livestock enclosures in Kajiado and Naivasha counties, Kenya, using CO₂-baited CDC miniature light traps. Traps were selected to maximise species diversity, and as light traps capture fewer engorged mosquitoes than resting traps, only 56 blood-fed individuals (1.2%) were collected and processed as whole-specimen homogenates and analysed for vertebrate blood-meal sources using cytochrome b sequencing. In total, 303 mosquito pools, including blood-fed individuals processed as single-mosquito pools, were screened for Anaplasma, Ehrlichia, Rickettsia, Theileria, and Babesia using PCR-high-resolution melting analysis and confirmatory sequencing.

resultsAll pathogen-positive detections were exclusively from blood-fed individuals. We detected Anaplasma marginale in Culex pipiens (1/150; 0.7%) and Aedes hirsutus (2/11; 18.2%), Anaplasma sp. in Cx. pipiens (2/150; 1.4%) and Ae. hirsutus (1/11; 9.1%), and Candidatus Neoehrlichia mikurensis in Mansonia africana (2/50; 4%). Pathogen detections showed strong host concordance, where A. marginale was associated with cattle-derived blood meals and Anaplasma sp. with goat-derived blood meals, while Candidatus Neoehrlichia mikurensis was detected in Mn. africana that had fed on cattle and on a host that could not be determined.

conclusionsOur results provide preliminary evidence that mosquito-based xenosurveillance can detect tick-borne bacterial pathogens circulating in livestock at human-wildlife interfaces in Kenya. The strong concordance between pathogen identity and vertebrate host in blood-fed mosquitoes supports the biological plausibility of this approach. Notably, detection of Ca. Neoehrlichia mikurensis represents the first report of this zoonotic pathogen in mosquitoes in Africa, highlighting the One Health relevance of xenosurveillance in identifying settings, where pathogen circulation and cross-interface feeding coincide. Mosquito-derived sampling has potential to complement existing surveillance tools in agro-pastoral systems, where direct host sampling is difficult or costly.

Indexed as

AnaplasmaAnaplasmataceaeAnaplasmataceae InfectionsCulicidaeLivestockAnimalsAnimals, WildHumansKenyaAnaplasma spp.Candidatus Neoehrlichia mikurensisMosquitoesNeoehrlichiaTick-borne pathogensVector-borne pathogensXenosurveillance

Identifiers

PMID42321905
PMCPMC13527995

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.