ArticleJournal of medical case reports2026
Combined oral contraceptive use as a cause of acute myocardial infarction in a young woman without traditional risk factors: a case report.
Article in Journal of medical case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCombined oral contraceptives are widely used and generally considered safe. However, they have been associated with arterial thrombosis, including myocardial infarction, particularly in women with cardiovascular risk factors. This case adds to the limited literature highlighting the potential for combined oral contraceptive-induced myocardial infarction in individuals without traditional cardiovascular risk factors. A 28-year-old non-smoking Iranian woman with no significant medical history presented with 11 h of typical anginal chest pain radiating to the left arm and interscapular area. Electrocardiography revealed ST-segment elevations in leads V2-V5, and cardiac biomarkers confirmed myocardial infarction. She had been taking a second-generation combined oral contraceptive containing 150 µg levonorgestrel and 30 µg ethinyl estradiol for 13 years. Emergent coronary angiography demonstrated a thrombotic occlusion in the mid-left anterior descending artery without evidence of underlying atherosclerosis. Successful reperfusion was achieved via balloon angioplasty without stenting. The patient remained stable, was discharged on optimal medical therapy, and advised to discontinue combined oral contraceptives. At 3-month follow-up, cardiac Computed Tomography Angiography revealed a patent left anterior descending artery with no residual stenosis, and echocardiography showed improved systolic function.
conclusionsThis case underscores the potential for thrombotic myocardial infarction in young women using combined oral contraceptives, even in the absence of conventional risk factors. It highlights the importance of considering hormonal contraceptive history in the diagnostic workup of acute coronary syndromes in young females. In addition, it demonstrates that Balloon angioplasty without stent placement may be effective in selected cases of non-atherosclerotic thrombotic occlusion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.