ReviewJournal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care2026
Efficacy and safety of intrathecal adjuvants in lower limb orthopaedic surgery: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
Review in Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIntrathecal adjuvants are frequently used in spinal anaesthesia for lower-limb surgery to enhance block quality and prolong postoperative analgesia. However, evidence remains fragmented across individual agents. This systematic review with frequentist network meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of intrathecal adjuvants in patients undergoing lower limb orthopaedic surgery to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of intrathecal adjuvants combined with long-acting local anaesthetics for lower limb orthopaedic surgery.
methodsA systematic search of PubMed, CENTRAL, and Embase was conducted to retrieve English-language RCTs involving adult patients undergoing lower limb orthopaedic surgery under single-shot spinal anaesthesia. We included trials evaluating any intrathecal drug or placebo added to a long-acting local anaesthetic. Our primary outcome was the duration of effective analgesia, defined as the time to the first analgesic requirement, in hours. We selected randomised controlled trials (RCTs) reported in English.
resultsWe included 183 RCTs, for a total of 14,431 patients and 27 interventions. Morphine combined with ketorolac, morphine alone followed by diamorphine, clonidine combined with morphine and ketamine combined with midazolam provided the greatest prolongation of effective analgesia. Morphine also significantly reduced pain at 12 h and postoperative opioid consumption with no impact on motor block duration. Dexmedetomidine reduced pain intensity at 12 h but substantially prolonged motor block duration and increased the incidence of bradycardia. Morphine and neostigmine showed an increased risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting, while several interventions increased the risk of pruritus. The certainty of evidence ranged from low to very low due to within-study bias, reporting bias, high heterogeneity, imprecision and incoherence.
conclusionsConsidering the body of evidence in an NMA framework, intrathecal morphine appears to offer a potentially favourable efficacy-safety balance. Dexmedetomidine may prolong motor block and increase the risk of bradycardia. The certainty of the evidence was low to very low and needs caution interpretation. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42024557751.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.