ArticleItalian journal of pediatrics2026
A comparison of pediatric sepsis definitions based on systemic inflammatory response syndrome and Phoenix criteria: a single-center PICU retrospective study.
Article in Italian journal of pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe 2024 international pediatric sepsis consensus definition has undergone a paradigm shift from a systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS)-based framework to the organ dysfunction-centered Phoenix Sepsis Criteria (PSC). We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic concordance, predictive performance for 28-day pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) mortality, and phenotypic overlap between these two pediatric sepsis definitions.
methodsThis single-center retrospective cohort study included 1034 children aged > 1 month to < 18 years with confirmed or suspected infection who were directly admitted to the PICU of Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University between January 1, 2020, and November 21, 2023. All patients were independently evaluated for sepsis using both the 2005 International Pediatric Sepsis Consensus Conference (IPSCC) SIRS criteria and the 2024 PSC. Diagnostic agreement was assessed using the Kappa coefficient. Binary logistic regression was employed to establish association models between factors and phenotypes, as well as between factors and PICU 28-day mortality. Predictive performance was compared using the C-statistic.
resultsAmong 1034 patients, 613 (59.3%) met the Sepsis-SIRS criteria with a 28-day PICU mortality of 15.2% (93/613), 744 (72.0%) met the Sepsis-Phoenix criteria with a mortality of 16.3% (121/744), 489 (47.3%) met both criteria with a mortality of 18.6% (91/489), and 166 (16.1%) met neither criterion with a mortality of 2.4% (4/166). Agreement between the two criteria was poor (kappa = 0.202, 95% CI: 0.143-0.261). After adjusting for clinically relevant confounders, the PSC remained a strong independent predictor of 28-day mortality (adjusted OR = 5.123, 95% CI: 2.128-12.333, p < 0.001), whereas the SIRS criteria showed no independent predictive value (adjusted OR = 0.937, 95% CI: 0.523-1.678, p = 0.827). The PSC demonstrated significantly superior discriminatory ability compared with the SIRS criteria (C-statistic = 0.809 vs. 0.589, p < 0.001). Notably, 20.2% of SIRS-positive patients were not classified as sepsis by the Phoenix Criteria, and this subgroup had an extremely low mortality of 1.6%, reflecting higher specificity of the PSC.
conclusionsThe SIRS and PSC identify partially overlapping populations with distinct risk stratification, showing poor diagnostic concordance. The PSC has superior independent predictive performance for PICU 28-day mortality and may be considered for prognostic assessment of infected children in the PICU setting. Importantly, historical study results based on the SIRS criteria should be extrapolated cautiously to PSC-defined populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.