ArticleJournal of cardiothoracic surgery2026
Ballistic fragment embolism to superior mesenteric artery after the shrapnel injury to the chest: a case report of casualty from Russia-Ukraine war.
Article in Journal of cardiothoracic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Russia-Ukraine war has produced widespread lethal ballistic trauma with unusual injury patterns, including rare cases of projectile migration and arterial embolism. Prompt differential management near frontlines is crucial to improve outcomes and reduce evacuation risk. The aim of the study was to present clinical features, diagnostic workup, and management of a combat patient with a penetrating chest wound, cardiac involvement, and subsequent migration of a ballistic fragment into the superior mesenteric artery (SMA), and to contextualize this case within existing literature on ballistic emboli. CASE PRESENTATION: A 41-year-old serviceman sustained a chest injury from FPV-drone munitions. Initial delayed evacuation and staged imaging (X-ray, FAST, whole-body CT) identified a ballistic channel from chest to abdomen and a metallic intraluminal fragment in the SMA. Clinical decision-making weighed endovascular versus open approaches amid tactical constraints and patient consent dynamics. Contrast-enhanced CT suggested transcardiac migration of the fragment into the SMA. With absent critical mesenteric ischemia and delayed consent, laparotomy on day 14 revealed an intraluminal metallic fragment that was removed via arteriotomy with primary repair. The patient recovered and was discharged after 21 days.
conclusionsThe arterial ballistic emboli must be suspected in patients with isolated chest- or thoracoabdominal injuries. The whole-body contrast-enhanced CT scan is an important diagnostic tool for patients with gunshot injuries. In the absence of evidence of bowel necrosis, surgery can be postponed in patients with SMA emboli. An important role in visualization is played by contrast-enhanced MSCT. We recommend removing projectile fragments from the major blood vessels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.