ArticleEnvironmental microbiome2026
Identification of keystone taxa shaping biocrust formation and biodeterioration of limestone monuments in the Xiaoling Tomb of the Ming Dynasty.
Article in Environmental microbiome, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The limestone monuments of the Rectangular Tower in the Xiaoling Tomb of the Ming Dynasty, created in the mid-fourteenth century, are biodeteriorating from environmental exposure, resulting in the formation of black biocrusts. However, the microbiomes that shape biocrust formation and the biodeterioration processes involved remain unclear, significantly challenging the conservation of stone monuments at this archaeological site. Here, we systematically investigated the physicochemical properties and microbial communities of biocrusts to identify keystone taxa that shape their formation and biodeterioration. Physicochemical analysis indicated that biological crusts are associated with calcium mobilization and redistribution of the limestone monuments. Microscopy and spectroscopy indicated that microbial interactions with limestone promote the formation of biological crusts. Importantly, we observed the significant predominance of Cyanobacteria and/or Chloroflexi in biocrusts, suggesting that photosynthesis may be a crucial process in biocrust formation. Fungal communities in biocrusts were dominated by Ascomycota, Basidiomycota, and Chytridiomycota, while archaeal communities were dominated solely by Nitrososphaerota. Microbial co-occurrence network and correlation analyses identified 12 keystone taxa across 11 genera that shape biocrust formation. Importantly, Scytonema spp. could provide organic carbon and nitrogen for Spirosomaceae spp., and members of the classes Cyanobacteriia and Agaricomycetes, as well as the genera Setophaeosphaeria and Plectosphaerella, are likely the keystone taxa responsible for both biocrust formation and the associated biodeterioration. Additionally, two predominant ammonia-oxidizing archaeal families (i.e., Nitrososphaeraceae and Candidatus Nitrocosmicus) could support chemolithoautotrophic growth in the microbiome by oxidizing ammonia and fixing carbon dioxide. Together, these findings underscore the need for targeted conservation strategies to mitigate microbial biodeterioration of stone monuments during biocrust formation.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.