ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2026
Vertebral infection after kyphoplasty: distinguishing misdiagnosis from true postoperative infection and implications for management.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSpinal infection following percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) is rare but clinically devastating. However, its true incidence, diagnostic challenges, and optimal revision strategies remain poorly defined, particularly in referral-based cohorts.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective study comprising two components: (1) an institutional incidence analysis of 6,328 PKP procedures performed between 2015 and 2025, and (2) a pooled clinical cohort of 39 patients treated for post-PKP spinal infection, including 3 hospital-acquired cases and 36 referred cases. Patients were managed with either surgical (n = 27) or conservative (n = 12) strategies. Within the surgical group, a selective cement management approach (complete removal vs. partial retention) was applied based on intraoperative assessment. Clinical, microbiological, and radiographic data were analyzed descriptively. Functional outcomes were assessed using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI).
resultsThe institutional incidence of post-PKP infection was 0.05% (3/6328). In the pooled cohort (n = 39), the median age was 72 years, all patients presented with back pain, and fever was present in 20 patients. Potential etiologies included hematogenous spread, preoperative misdiagnosis, and iatrogenic factors. Eight cases of spinal tuberculosis were initially misdiagnosed as osteoporotic fractures. Microbiological confirmation was limited, with low culture positivity. Surgical management was associated with lower ODI scores at final follow-up compared to conservative treatment; however, interpretation is limited by baseline imbalance and selection bias. Among surgically treated survivors, infection control and radiographic fusion were observed at final follow-up. No recurrence was recorded in 8 carefully selected patients managed with partial cement retention; however, this observation remains limited by the small subgroup size and the absence of matched controls.
conclusionsPost-PKP vertebral infection is uncommon but clinically challenging and often complicated by diagnostic uncertainty. Surgical debridement and stabilization may be useful in selected patients. Partial cement retention can be considered only in selected situations, and its wider use requires further validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.