ReviewMolecular cancer2026
Extracellular vesicles in solid tumors: from tumor ecology to engineered therapeutics.
Review in Molecular cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are important mediators of intercellular communication in solid tumors. Released by malignant, stromal, immune, and microbial cells, they influence tumor evolution by transferring proteins, nucleic acids, lipids, and metabolites that reshape local and systemic signaling. Current evidence implicates EVs in tumor microenvironment remodeling, metastatic niche formation, immune regulation, and adaptive responses to metabolic and therapeutic stress. However, these functions are highly context-dependent and remain unevenly supported across tumor types, disease stages, and experimental systems. Mechanistically, EV production is increasingly understood not as a constitutive secretory event, but as an adaptive output of intracellular trafficking and metabolic programs that govern vesicle fate, cargo selection, and release under stress. The same properties that complicate biological interpretation-including heterogeneity, membrane plasticity, and context-dependent cargo sorting-also make EVs attractive candidates for therapeutic engineering. In this Review, we critically examine EV biology in solid tumors by connecting biogenesis, trafficking control, lipid metabolism, and functional heterogeneity with emerging engineering strategies, including source selection, surface modification, cargo loading, and hybrid engineering strategies. We further discuss the major barriers that continue to limit clinical translation, particularly biological heterogeneity, isolation-dependent variability, incomplete mechanistic resolution, manufacturing scalability, and regulatory standardization. By distinguishing more established principles from emerging or model-restricted findings, this Review aims to provide a balanced assessment of both the opportunities and the current limitations of EV-based diagnostics and therapeutics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42321851What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.