ArticleReproductive health2026
Prevalence and risk factors of home delivery among rural women: evidence from 28 African countries.
Article in Reproductive health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHome delivery continues to be a significant factor contributing to maternal mortality in Africa, particularly among rural women with limited access to skilled birth attendants and healthcare facilities. Factors influencing home delivery operate at individual, household, and community levels. Therefore, this study aimed to examine the prevalence and risk factors of home delivery among rural women in 28 African countries.
methodsThis retrospective cross-sectional study analyzed the most recent Demographic and Health Surveys (2011-2024) from 28 African countries. The weighted sample included 103,011 rural women of reproductive age. We performed descriptive analysis, chi-square tests, and binary logistic regression. Results are presented as frequencies, percentages, and odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.
resultsThe overall prevalence of home delivery among rural women in Africa was 34.01% [95% CI: 23.33%-35.26%], ranging from 5.91% in Rwanda to 85.19% in Chad. Women with mistimed pregnancy [aOR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.76-0.82] and those with unwanted pregnancy [aOR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.81-0.92] had lower odds of home delivery. Risk factors included having four or more births [aOR = 2.04, 95% CI = 1.91-2.17], no/other religion [aOR = 2.41, 95% CI = 2.24-2.56] and those in Central Africa [aOR = 2.09, 95% CI = 1.98-2.19].
conclusionThis research reveals that home delivery remains prevalent among rural women in Africa, with significant between-country disparities. Key risk factors include high parity, no/other religion, and Central African residence. Programs should prioritize multiparous women and expand maternal health services across all religious groups. Additionally, context-specific policies and targeted investments are needed in Central Africa to address regional disparities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.