Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42321815›Full record

ArticleBMC research notes2026

Monitoring infestation levels using an AI-based Chironomid quantification tool (CQT) in a laboratory Xenopus laevis facility.

Maximilian Schwarzbach, Bastian Popper

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC research notes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Maximilian SchwarzbachCore Facility Animal Models, Biomedical Center, Medical Faculty, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Bastian PopperCore Facility Animal Models, Biomedical Center, Medical Faculty, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany. Bastian.Popper@bmc.med.lmu.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveInsect infestations in laboratory animal facilities represent a potential risk to animal welfare, staff hygiene, and experimental integrity. In this study, we developed and applied a custom AI-assisted image analysis workflow, the Chironomid Quantification Tool (CQT-AI), to detect and quantify infestations of non-biting midges (Chironomidae) in an aquatic housing system for Xenopus laevis. To evaluate the applicability of CQT-AI for monitoring infestation dynamics and treatment effects, different control strategies, including increased water exchange and biological control using Bacillus thuringiensis israelensis (Bti), were tested in parallel.

resultsCQT-AI proved to be a reliable tool for detecting and quantifying infestation dynamics of adult Chironomidae, enabling objective assessment of treatment effects within 1 min. Increased water exchange resulted in measurable changes in water chemistry but only moderately reduced infestation levels. In contrast, treatment with Bti led to rapid and near-complete eradication of adult midges within six weeks without detectable adverse effects on animal health. Overall, the study demonstrates that CQT-AI provides an efficient and objective approach for monitoring infestation dynamics and evaluating control strategies in aquatic laboratory systems.

Indexed as

ChironomidaeHousing, AnimalPest Control, BiologicalXenopus laevisAnimalsAnimals, LaboratoryBacillus thuringiensisBacillus thuringiensis israelensisChironomidaeClawed frogsDiptera

Identifiers

PMID42321815
PMCPMC13340404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.