ReviewJournal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine2026
Wild plant trade in Mexican traditional market: an ethnobotanical review from a socio-ecological systems perspective.
Review in Journal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTraditional markets in Mexico are longstanding centers of biocultural exchange where wild plants are commercialized for diverse purposes, with important socio‑ecological implications. However, research in this topic remains fragmented across disciplines. This review critically examines and synthesizes scientific literature on the trade of wild plants in traditional Mexican markets to assess accumulated knowledge, prevailing theoretical approaches, and the extent to which this activity has been conceptualized within a socio‑ecological systems (SES) framework.
methodsWe conducted a systematic search of major academic databases and analyzed studies documenting wild plant trade in traditional markets across Mexico. We identified traded species, their origin, and their uses, and examined reported social, ecological, and economic variables, emphasized their integration within an SES perspective. Ethnobotanical potential and knowledge gaps were also evaluated for each Mexican state.
resultsBased on 32 studies documenting 60 traditional markets, we recorded 902 species (528 genera, 131 families), primarily Orchidaceae, Asteraceae, Fabaceae, Cactaceae, and Bromeliaceae. Most of the species were native to Mexico and were frequently harvested from the wild, including numerous taxa listed under conservation status. Medicinal and food uses predominated, while ornamental and ritual uses reflected strong cultural drivers of demand. Although most studies reported variables relevant to SES analyses, they were largely descriptive and rarely applied integrative, hypothesis‑driven SES frameworks. Oaxaca, Chiapas, Veracruz, State of Mexico, and Puebla exhibited the highest ethnobotanical potential; while the highest ethnobotanical gap values were found in Chiapas, Veracruz, Guerrero, and San Luis Potosí.
conclusionsKey ethnobotanical theories guiding plant selection and use where identified, along with critical research gaps related to governance, consumer behavior, ecological impacts, and management practices. Traditional markets represent strategic settings for advancing SES‑based ethnobotanical research and promoting sustainability that balance biodiversity conservation, livelihoods, and cultural continuity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.