ArticleBMC health services research2026
Professionals' perspectives on trusted persons in French nursing homes.
Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFrance faces growing challenges with an aging population and neurodegenerative disorders. French health law allows patients to appoint a trusted person ("personne de confiance") to communicate their medical preferences if incapacitated. Introduced by the Kouchner Law in 2002, this reflects a shift from paternalistic to autonomist care, emphasizing patient autonomy. Despite their importance in conveying patient wishes in nursing homes, research remains limited, with most studies focusing on hospitals.
methodsWe conducted semi-structured interviews with 14 healthcare professionals (directors, psychologists, coordinating physicians, nurse managers, psychometricians) working in or with French nursing homes from February 2021 to September 2022. Interviews lasted 26-80 min and we analyzed them using grounded theory methodology. Theoretical saturation was achieved after 9 interviews and confirmed through 5 additional interviews.
resultsThrough grounded theory analysis, we identified that professionals continuously balance three competing needs when collaborating with trusted persons: patient-oriented needs (ensuring care quality, safety, dignified end-of-life), relatives-oriented needs (supporting families, protecting mental health), and self-oriented needs (legal protection, professional well-being, administrative efficiency). This core balancing process is shaped by three contextual factors: (1) evolving nursing home environments with cognitively impaired residents and regulatory complexity; (2) insufficient knowledge of the trusted person system among families and professionals; and (3) family burden during end-of-life phases, including guilt and death-related taboos. Under the influence of these contextual factors, professionals' balancing efforts manifest through heterogeneous practices in informing families about designation and varied approaches to involving trusted persons in decision-making and care.
conclusionFrom the perspective of healthcare professionals, effective trusted person involvement would be facilitated by early education before admission. Our findings suggest organizational and educational interventions may improve trusted person collaboration, though research engaging trusted persons and patients directly is needed to validate these professional perspectives and develop appropriate interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.