ArticleBMC health services research2026
Building bridges in diabetic foot ulcer care: a realist evaluation of the cross-sectoral use of telemedicine solutions.
Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOver the past decade, the digitalization of health and telemedicine solutions has accelerated. Optimized digital infrastructure enables telemedicine as a complementary health care service, reducing organizational pressures and increasing accessibility. Tele medicine (TM) is well suited for chronic wound care, particularly diabetes-related foot ulcers, owing to its photo documentation and data exchange capabilities. This study aimed to explore health care professionals' (HCPs') cross-sectoral use of TM technology for the treatment and care of patients with diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs).
methodThe study used a realistic evaluation design. From 2023 to 2024, we conducted 68 h of participant observation of healthcare professionals in hospital and primary care during DFU treatment within a Danish cross-sectoral setting. The Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (SRQR) were applied.
resultsWe generated three key themes: (1) Time matters: navigating allocated and limited time in person-centred care and treatment. (2) Tech hurdles: adapting/aligning perceptions and mastering digital tools. (3) Building bridges: the power of relationships in sustaining telemedicine use.
conclusionOur study led to a refined program theory allowing us to propose an answer to the problem of "what works, for whom, and under what circumstances": HCPs' cross-sectoral collaboration using the TM communication solution Pleje.net© enhances the treatment and care of patients with DFUs. This improvement is achieved in a cross-sectoral setting when care management addresses organizational challenges, such as managing time constraints, overcoming technological hurdles, and fostering strong relationships among HCPs. When robust relationships are present, the TM solution facilitates timely and coordinated care across different sectors, ultimately improving patient outcomes in a multidisciplinary setting. Findings are limited to a Danish cross-sectoral healthcare context and may not be directly transferable to other health systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.