Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42321787›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2026

Lean management of crisis response and post-pandemic outcomes in US primary care practices.

Dorothy Y Hung, Stephen M Shortell, Elicica Morris, Catalina Y Quach, Elina Reponen, Thomas Rotter, Agustin Perez-Araos, Karen E Schifferdecker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Dorothy Y HungDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Center for Lean Engagement and Research, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA. Dorothy.Hung@berkeley.edu.
Stephen M ShortellDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Center for Lean Engagement and Research, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Elicica MorrisDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Center for Lean Engagement and Research, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Catalina Y QuachDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Center for Lean Engagement and Research, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Elina ReponenHUS Shared Group Services, Customer Relations, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Thomas RotterHealth Quality Program, School of Nursing, Queens University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Agustin Perez-AraosDepartment of Industrial Engineering, School of Engineering, Monterrey Tech, Guadalajara, Mexico.
Karen E SchifferdeckerDepartment of Community & Family Medicine, The Dartmouth Institute, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrimary care forms the basis for valued outcomes in health systems, including population health, high quality care, and reduced health expenditures. However, the primary care system in the United States (US) faces many difficulties, including financial pressures and clinician burnout that accelerated following the Covid-19 pandemic. This study examines the ability of primary care practices to adapt to post-pandemic challenges using a lean management system for quality and process improvement.

methodsWe used data from the National Survey of Healthcare Organizations and Systems II, a nationally representative sample of 1,245 physician practices located across the US. We first described the status of lean implementation among these primary care practices. We then conducted bivariate analyses followed by multivariate logistic regressions to examine relationships between lean implementation and outcomes of interest, including pandemic response activities, financial performance after the pandemic, and impacts of workforce shortages on patient care.

resultsPractices that adopted lean management were significantly larger in size (p < 0.05), affiliated with a health system or federally qualified health center (p < 0.0001), had a higher percentage of revenue from Medicaid (p < 0.0001) but lower percentage from Medicare insurance (p < 0.05), participated in more capitated payment arrangements and Accountable Care Organization contract types (p < 0.01), and were more evenly distributed across geographic regions of the country (p < 0.001). Controlling for these contextual features, we found that lean practices were more likely to participate in an incident command system for pandemic response (OR = 2.45, 95% CI: 1.24-4.82), engage in efforts to address clinician burnout (OR = 1.29, 95% CI: 1.03-1.60), and report stronger financial performance after the pandemic (OR = 2.57, 95% CI: 1.40-4.73). Additionally, after adjusting for all other lean processes, practice use of rapid improvement events (OR = 0.20, 95% CI: 0.06-0.70) and real-time data analysis tools (OR = 0.31, 95% CI: 0.11-0.90) was associated with lower reported impacts of workforce shortages on patient care.

conclusionHealth systems continue to face challenges, making them vulnerable to major disruptions as experienced with the recent pandemic. Lean management may enhance organizational resilience and theability of primary care practices to respond to rapidly evolving environments.

Indexed as

COVID-19Primary Health CareQuality ImprovementTotal Quality ManagementHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2United StatesClinician burnoutCovid-19 responseFinancial performanceIncident command systemLean managementMultivariate logistic regressionNational survey dataPrimary care practicesQuality/Process improvementWorkforce shortages

Identifiers

PMID42321787
PMCPMC13508409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.