Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42321782›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2026

Pharmacy students' perspectives and training needs on simulation-based interprofessional education at a University in Southwestern Uganda: a qualitative study.

Julius Kyomya, Josephine Nambi Najjuma, Fredrick Atwiine, Edward John Lukyamuzi, Pius Musinguzi, Emmanuel Maleka, Samuel Maling, Rose Muhindo, Shewatatek Gedamu Wonde

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Julius KyomyaDepartment of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara City, Uganda. jkyomya@must.ac.ug.
Josephine Nambi NajjumaDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara City, Uganda.
Fredrick AtwiineDepartment of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara City, Uganda.
Edward John LukyamuziDepartment of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara City, Uganda.
Pius MusinguziDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara City, Uganda.
Emmanuel MalekaDepartment of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara City, Uganda.
Samuel MalingDepartment of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara City, Uganda.
Rose MuhindoDepartment of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara City, Uganda.
Shewatatek Gedamu WondeInstitute of Health, Jimma University, Jimma City, Ethiopia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPharmacy graduates are expected to collaborate effectively within interprofessional healthcare teams. However, current training lacks structured opportunities for interprofessional learning. Simulation-based interprofessional education (sim-IPE) offers a promising approach to address this gap. This study explored the training needs and perceptions of pharmacy students regarding sim-IPE at Mbarara University of Science and Technology (MUST).

methodsWe conducted a formative qualitative study among pharmacy students and faculty at MUST in October 2025. In-depth interviews were conducted with 14 fourth-year pharmacy students, and key informant interviews with three purposively selected faculty members involved in curriculum design. Data was collected using interview guides developed based on the Theoretical Domains Framework. Audio-recorded data were transcribed verbatim, cleaned and analyzed in NVivo version 14 using framework analysis.

resultsFour themes emerged. First, the current clinical training was constrained by limited clinical training exposure, preceptor shortages, and siloed learning. Second, barriers to IPE included professional hierarchy, low student confidence, scheduling conflicts, and limited simulation capacity. Third, the enablers for successful implementation included skilled facilitation, curriculum integration, institutional support, and simulation's safe learning environment. Fourth, effective communication skills, pharmaceutical care, and interprofessional collaboration competencies were identified as essential needs for effective participation. Participants anticipated benefits for professional development and patient care from interprofessional learning.

conclusionPharmacy students and faculty perceived sim-IPE as a valuable approach for addressing gaps in current clinical training and strengthening readiness for collaborative practice. The main training needs identified were communication skills, role clarity, teamwork, pharmaceutical care competencies, and confidence to contribute within interprofessional teams. Implementation will require attention to professional hierarchy, faculty preparation, curriculum integration, scheduling, and simulation resources. These findings provide practical guidance for the design of a contextually appropriate sim-IPE module for undergraduate pharmacy students in Uganda and similar resource-constrained health professions education settings.

Indexed as

Education, PharmacyInterprofessional EducationInterprofessional RelationsSimulation TrainingStudents, PharmacyAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelCurriculumFemaleHumansMaleQualitative ResearchUgandaClinical CompetencyInterprofessional EducationPharmacy EducationSimulation TrainingUganda

Identifiers

PMID42321782
PMCPMC13531807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.