ArticleBMC medical education2026
Pharmacy students' perspectives and training needs on simulation-based interprofessional education at a University in Southwestern Uganda: a qualitative study.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPharmacy graduates are expected to collaborate effectively within interprofessional healthcare teams. However, current training lacks structured opportunities for interprofessional learning. Simulation-based interprofessional education (sim-IPE) offers a promising approach to address this gap. This study explored the training needs and perceptions of pharmacy students regarding sim-IPE at Mbarara University of Science and Technology (MUST).
methodsWe conducted a formative qualitative study among pharmacy students and faculty at MUST in October 2025. In-depth interviews were conducted with 14 fourth-year pharmacy students, and key informant interviews with three purposively selected faculty members involved in curriculum design. Data was collected using interview guides developed based on the Theoretical Domains Framework. Audio-recorded data were transcribed verbatim, cleaned and analyzed in NVivo version 14 using framework analysis.
resultsFour themes emerged. First, the current clinical training was constrained by limited clinical training exposure, preceptor shortages, and siloed learning. Second, barriers to IPE included professional hierarchy, low student confidence, scheduling conflicts, and limited simulation capacity. Third, the enablers for successful implementation included skilled facilitation, curriculum integration, institutional support, and simulation's safe learning environment. Fourth, effective communication skills, pharmaceutical care, and interprofessional collaboration competencies were identified as essential needs for effective participation. Participants anticipated benefits for professional development and patient care from interprofessional learning.
conclusionPharmacy students and faculty perceived sim-IPE as a valuable approach for addressing gaps in current clinical training and strengthening readiness for collaborative practice. The main training needs identified were communication skills, role clarity, teamwork, pharmaceutical care competencies, and confidence to contribute within interprofessional teams. Implementation will require attention to professional hierarchy, faculty preparation, curriculum integration, scheduling, and simulation resources. These findings provide practical guidance for the design of a contextually appropriate sim-IPE module for undergraduate pharmacy students in Uganda and similar resource-constrained health professions education settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.