ArticleBMC oral health2026
Understanding how to promote oral care 'mouth minutes' in care homes: qualitative study with utilisation of the COM-B framework.
Article in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Committing to oral care support for older people living in long-term residential care settings: A theoretically informed scoping review of enablers and barriers influencing care staff behaviours.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOlder adults are vulnerable to poor oral health due to physiological and cognitive changes, multiple medications, and dependence on carers. Despite national guidance, oral care in UK care homes remains inconsistent, and many staff report lacking the personal skills, organisational support, and confidence to deliver consistent oral care despite highlighting their commitment to deliver effective "mouth minutes" as part of daily routines. This study aims to examine care home and dental stakeholders' views on supporting residents' oral health, using the COM-B model to identify factors shaping staff oral-health-related behaviours.
methodsFocus groups were undertaken between June 2022 and November 2022 with the following 4 stakeholder groups to explore perspectives of supporting oral health maintenance in care home residents: (1) residents and relatives, (2) care home frontline workers, (3) care home managers and (4) external oral healthcare professionals (Oral HCPs) with care home experience. Framework analysis was undertaken at a semantic level and then matrices were mapped onto the COM-B model.
resultsFifty participants from three care homes (residential and nursing homes), and external oral HCPs in Great Britain took part: 11 residents, 6 relatives, 25 care home staff (managers and frontline workers) and 8 external oral HCPs. Mapped against the COM-B framework; Opportunity, particularly Physical Environment, Context, and Resources, was the most frequently coded construct. There was also alignment with Capability, especially Behavioural Regulation and Skills, and within Motivation, beliefs about Consequences and Capabilities.
conclusionsAccess to external oral healthcare professionals, tailored training, and organisational support were pivotal to improving oral health in care homes. The study confirms that micro‑level interventions are insufficient, as structural barriers-including limited dental access, workload pressures, and inconsistent resources-continue to undermine practice. Care home staff emphasised condition‑specific training and structured communication; relatives sought guidance to support loved ones; and external oral HCPs highlighted working and recognition of oral health as part of wellbeing. Aligning intervention design with the COM‑B framework provides a pathway to address structural, motivational, and capability barriers as interacting influences on oral care behaviour in care homes. This study explains why existing interventions fail by illustrating how Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation intersect, advancing COM‑B from a categorisation tool to an implementation‑focused framework.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.