ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2026
Axial pain after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: risk factor analysis and imaging evaluation.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAxial pain can occur as a complication following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), which is frequently regarded as a complication of posterior cervical surgery and is often overlooked after ACDF. However, the risk factors of postoperative axial pain (PAP) remain incompletely elucidated. This study aimed to analyze the risk factors and radiological assessment of PAP in patients undergoing ACDF.
methodsIndividuals undergoing ACDF between January 2020 to March 2023 were included. Participants were categorized into two groups by PAP presence. Clinical parameters were collected, and radiographic parameters measured included pre- and postoperative C
resultsIn ACDF patients, PAP prevalence was 15.5% in single-level surgery and 19.8% in multi-level surgery. For single-level ACDF, logistic regression analysis identified postoperative relative FJD change as a PAP risk factor (Area Under the Curve [AUC] = 0.809, optimal cutoff = 27.95%). For multi-level ACDF, postoperative C
conclusionsDuring ACDF procedures, minimizing FJD in single-level surgery and avoiding excessive C
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.