ArticleBMC surgery2026
Technical feasibility of hand-meshed autologous dermal grafts in immediate prepectoral breast reconstruction: a preliminary case series.
Article in BMC surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPrepectoral breast reconstruction offers reduced morbidity and improved aesthetic outcomes compared to traditional approaches. However, access to cost-effective and biologically compatible tissue for implant support remains limited. This case series explores the use of hand-meshed autologous dermal grafts harvested from patients as a readily available and cost-effective alternative for implant coverage.
methodsBreasts underwent immediate prepectoral implant-based reconstruction using hand-meshed autologous dermal grafts, harvested from the lower abdomen, the ipsilateral breast, or the contralateral breast, in a prepectoral breast reconstruction technique referred to as harvested corium-covered implant (HACCIM). Data regarding clinical, surgical, and short-term minor and major complications were recorded and analyzed.
resultsSixteen patients (21 breasts) underwent prepectoral implant-based reconstruction with autologous hand-meshed dermal grafts. The mean duration of dermal graft preparation and donor site repair was 36 min. Minor complications occurred in 10 breasts as superficial mastectomy skin flap wound events, with 4 also showing small wound dehiscence; all were managed conservatively. Major complications occurred in 2 of 21 cases: one involving a large radiation-induced skin ulcer following early postoperative radiotherapy (initiated 4 weeks after surgery), which resulted in implant exposure and eventual loss; and another involving implant loss in a patient who had received radiotherapy 18 months before reconstruction.
conclusionThis case series suggests the technical feasibility of hand-meshed free dermal autograft in immediate prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction. However, minor superficial mastectomy skin flap wound events were common, indicating a clinically relevant complication burden. Implant loss was also observed in two patients with recent pre- or postoperative radiotherapy exposure. Given the small sample size, these findings remain descriptive, and larger prospective studies are needed to further evaluate the safety, complication profile, and long-term outcomes of this approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.