ArticleBMC plant biology2026
Resistance architecture and breeding implications of blast and bacterial blight resistance genes in core WDR parents.
Article in BMC plant biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWater-saving and drought-resistance rice (WDR) is crucial for sustainable cultivation under water scarcity, yet its productivity is increasingly compromised by rice blast and bacterial blight (BB). A systematic assessment of resistance gene deployment in elite WDR parents is urgently needed to guide resistance breeding.
resultsWe dissected the resistance architecture of 47 core WDR parental lines by genotyping 11 blast and 4 BB resistance genes. For blast, Ptr was nearly fixed (97.9%), whereas loci previously reported to confer broad-spectrum blast resistance, such as Pigm (0%) and Pi9 (19.1%), were scarce. Blast resistance scores correlated negatively with gene number (ρ = -0.330, P = 0.023). For BB, resistance genes were only detected in 34.0% of lines, mainly restorers, with Xa23 (21.3%) and Xa7 (23.4%) being most frequent. The recessive gene xa5 was absent, and Xa21 (8.5%) was rare. BB resistance exhibited a strong negative correlation with gene count (ρ = -0.771, P < 0.001).
conclusionsResistance-associated loci were unevenly distributed in the WDR breeding panel, with apparent gaps in loci previously associated with durable or broad-spectrum resistance. These findings provide a preliminary basis for genotype-guided parental selection and marker-assisted pyramiding strategies in WDR breeding. Previous resistance-oriented improvement of elite restorers further suggests the potential value of integrating resistance-locus profiling with breeding design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.