ArticleCancer medicine2026
Optimizing Outcomes in Elderly HNSCC: Efficacy of UFT Metronomic Therapy.
Article in Cancer medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionHead and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) remains a significant clinical challenge, especially in elderly patients with advanced-stage disease and multiple comorbidities. Metronomic chemotherapy with oral tegafur-uracil (UFT) offers a low-toxicity maintenance option that may improve outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of UFT as metronomic therapy in elderly patients with nondistant metastatic stage III/IV HNSCC. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis retrospective study included patients aged ≥ 70 years diagnosed with non-distant metastatic stage III/IV HNSCC between January 1, 2008 and December 31, 2023 at a single center. Patients were divided into two groups: those receiving metronomic UFT following initial treatment (UFT group) and those without UFT (non-UFT group). The primary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to assess the impact of UFT on survival outcomes.
resultsA total of 103 patients were included, with 40 in the UFT group and 63 in the non-UFT group. The UFT group showed significantly longer PFS (median: 24.6 vs. 7.2 months, p = 0.0011) and OS (median: 26.0 vs. 9.6 months, p = 0.012). Multivariate analysis confirmed the independent association of UFT with improved PFS and OS.
conclusionsMetronomic UFT was associated with improved PFS and OS in elderly patients with advanced HNSCC and was well tolerated, with all adverse events limited to grade 1-2. Landmark analysis confirmed that the observed benefit was not attributable to immortal time bias. These exploratory findings warrant validation in prospective studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.