ArticleNature computational science2026
Evidence of scaling advantage on an NP-complete problem with enhanced quantum solvers.
Article in Nature computational science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evidence of scaling advantage on an NP-complete problem with enhanced quantum solvers.Nature computational science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Achieving quantum advantage remains a milestone in the noisy intermediate-scale quantum era. Without complexity proofs, scaling advantage-where quantum resource requirements grow more slowly than their classical counterparts-is the primary indicator. However, direct applications of quantum optimization algorithms to classically intractable problems have yet to demonstrate this advantage. Here we develop enhanced quantum solvers for the NP-complete one-in-three Boolean satisfiability problem. We propose a restricting space reduction algorithm that achieves optimal search-space dimensionality under mod-2 arithmetic, thereby reducing qubit requirements and time complexity. Numerical studies on instances with up to 70 variables demonstrate that our enhanced quantum approximate optimization algorithm- and quantum adiabatic algorithm-based solvers outperform state-of-the-art classical solvers; the quantum adiabatic algorithm-based solver serves as a lower-bound reference while retaining scaling advantage. Furthermore, experiments on a 13-qubit superconducting processor confirm the predicted improvements. Collectively, our results provide empirical evidence of quantum speedup for an NP-complete problem.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.